<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday&#8230;Still musing about sovereignty claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/</link>
	<description>Ian Lind • Online daily from Kaaawa, Hawaii</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Parx</title>
		<link>http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Parx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Finally got to read your Honolulu Weekly piece and your premise is a bit short of fully accurate.  A constitutional monarchy can be a far cry from a despotic monarchy. And the fact that the Hawai`i Constitution was foisted at gunpoint previous to the overthrow makes those latter consitutions as illegitimate and invalid as the post-overthrow government. 

Just because there are some with a Napoleonic complex- which runs the gamut from the Royal Societies to some of the “I am the king/queen” sovereignty groups- doesn’t mean a constitution-based independent nation with a monarch (even like Great Britain) can’t be a valid 21st Century entity in the islands. There are “democracies” that are as bad or worse than any monarchy as far as having a single despotic leader who pulls their country into plunderous foreign wars, takes away citizens’ rights and leads them to financial ruin for their own and their cronies’ enrichment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally got to read your Honolulu Weekly piece and your premise is a bit short of fully accurate.  A constitutional monarchy can be a far cry from a despotic monarchy. And the fact that the Hawai`i Constitution was foisted at gunpoint previous to the overthrow makes those latter consitutions as illegitimate and invalid as the post-overthrow government. </p>
<p>Just because there are some with a Napoleonic complex- which runs the gamut from the Royal Societies to some of the “I am the king/queen” sovereignty groups- doesn’t mean a constitution-based independent nation with a monarch (even like Great Britain) can’t be a valid 21st Century entity in the islands. There are “democracies” that are as bad or worse than any monarchy as far as having a single despotic leader who pulls their country into plunderous foreign wars, takes away citizens’ rights and leads them to financial ruin for their own and their cronies’ enrichment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onibaba</title>
		<link>http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>onibaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 09:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/#comment-742</guid>
		<description>Don?t know why so many expect the issue of sovereignty to be uni-dimensional. Sovereignty issues (or statehood issues for that matter) are as vast as any political spectrum.   Just as there are some that seek a return to the monarcy, there are others that see self-determination to be de-militarization or de-colonization, while others, subscribe to a version of self-determination that is more parliamentary.

The idea of agreeing to disagree in a parliament seems far more representational than our current two-party system.

The most rewarding system of governance is one that encourages real debate.  I for one, might not agree with Mahealani Kehau, but I applaud the theatricality of her actions, and if this bit of theater is what it takes to ferment more engagement from the spectrum of sovereignty groups, then all the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don?t know why so many expect the issue of sovereignty to be uni-dimensional. Sovereignty issues (or statehood issues for that matter) are as vast as any political spectrum.   Just as there are some that seek a return to the monarcy, there are others that see self-determination to be de-militarization or de-colonization, while others, subscribe to a version of self-determination that is more parliamentary.</p>
<p>The idea of agreeing to disagree in a parliament seems far more representational than our current two-party system.</p>
<p>The most rewarding system of governance is one that encourages real debate.  I for one, might not agree with Mahealani Kehau, but I applaud the theatricality of her actions, and if this bit of theater is what it takes to ferment more engagement from the spectrum of sovereignty groups, then all the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temporis</title>
		<link>http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>temporis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilind.net/2008/05/18/sundaystill-musing-about-sovereignty-claims/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Hey, this Hawaiian would rather have western-style democracy imposed on him by the white man than keep the indiginous monarchy that executes people for getting their damn shadow on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this Hawaiian would rather have western-style democracy imposed on him by the white man than keep the indiginous monarchy that executes people for getting their damn shadow on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

