<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday (2)&#8230;Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals rejects Campaign Spending Commission&#8217;s attempt to impose $1,000 limit on corporate contributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilind.net/2009/06/25/thursday-2hawaii-intermediate-court-of-appeals-rejects-campaign-spending-commissions-attempt-to-impose-1000-limit-on-corporate-contributions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilind.net/2009/06/25/thursday-2hawaii-intermediate-court-of-appeals-rejects-campaign-spending-commissions-attempt-to-impose-1000-limit-on-corporate-contributions/</link>
	<description>Ian Lind • Online daily from Kaaawa, Hawaii</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ketchupandfries</title>
		<link>http://ilind.net/2009/06/25/thursday-2hawaii-intermediate-court-of-appeals-rejects-campaign-spending-commissions-attempt-to-impose-1000-limit-on-corporate-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>ketchupandfries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilind.net/?p=2708#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that HB128 passed last session: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/bills/HB128_CD2_.htm

It looks like it&#039;ll become law w/o the Gov&#039;s sig, but I&#039;d say this alters the dialog substantially since it was written to clarify the $1000 cap.  It also restates the reporting requirements that were the premise of requiring corporate contributors to register as noncandidate committees.  This isn&#039;t over yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that HB128 passed last session: <a href="http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/bills/HB128_CD2_.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2009/bills/HB128_CD2_.htm</a></p>
<p>It looks like it&#8217;ll become law w/o the Gov&#8217;s sig, but I&#8217;d say this alters the dialog substantially since it was written to clarify the $1000 cap.  It also restates the reporting requirements that were the premise of requiring corporate contributors to register as noncandidate committees.  This isn&#8217;t over yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfrnikki</title>
		<link>http://ilind.net/2009/06/25/thursday-2hawaii-intermediate-court-of-appeals-rejects-campaign-spending-commissions-attempt-to-impose-1000-limit-on-corporate-contributions/comment-page-1/#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>cfrnikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilind.net/?p=2708#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>... and every session, legislators have the opportunity to fix this once and for all, with a ban or a very low limit. Rep Berg offered a very clean amendment with the $1,000 cap at the end of last session.  The legislature could easily pick up that same language and pass it. Will they try?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and every session, legislators have the opportunity to fix this once and for all, with a ban or a very low limit. Rep Berg offered a very clean amendment with the $1,000 cap at the end of last session.  The legislature could easily pick up that same language and pass it. Will they try?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

