i L i n d

Ian Lind • Now online daily from Old Kahala

i L i n d header image 2

City managing director responds on HPR, and Legislature tries another route to undermine legal reviews of the rail EIS

March 9th, 2010 · 2 Comments

We were just a couple of blocks from home on the last leg of yesterday’s early morning walk when a friend stopped her car and rolled down the window.

She was laughing.

“You’re being quoted on public radio right now!”

It was a surprise to me. It was late afternoon before I learned that Honolulu Managing Director and mayoral candidate, Kirk Caldwell, apparently felt he had to respond to my commentary on rail broadcast last week. For those who missed it, my original can be found here.

Frankly, I didn’t hear anything in Caldwell’s generalities to change my mind. But I guess it shows this discussion is being taken seriously.

Then I got a surprise when Hawaii’s Thousand Friends, the public interest environmental and land use planning organization, pointed out that a bill to expedite county processing of permits is being touted as a way to force quick approval of the city’s as yet unpublished EIS for the rail project.

HB 2434, introduced by House Speaker Calvin Say “by request”, started out as what looked like a straightforward proposal to require the other counties to adopt the kind of “third party approval” system that Honolulu has already adopted. It would allow a contractor waiting for a building permit, for example, to hire a private party to review plans and certify that they meet city requirements. This private review is in lieu of action by the county.

The bill also added relatively short deadlines for processing of permits and “other approvals” by the state and counties. If not processed by the 30-45 day deadlines, and without regard to the scope of the proposed action or complexity of the issues raised, applications would be automatically approved.

The automatic approval provisions are extremely broad. Now we know why.

House Standing Committee Report 486 puts the rail issue front and center.

Your Committee finds that while this bill will facilitate all types of construction jobs, its most immediate impact will be to expedite construction of Honolulu rail, which is shovel-ready and will generate jobs and assist local businesses by pouring federal monies into our economy.

The bill has been set for a Friday morning joint hearing before the Senate Committee on Water, Land, Agriculture, and Hawaiian Affairs, chaired by Sen. Clayton Hee, and the Committee on Transportation, International and Intergovernmental Affairs, chaired by Sen. Kalani English.

More information on HB2434, including its current status, the house drafts, committee reports, and testimony, can be found on the Capitol web site.

Tags: Politics

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 zweisystem // Mar 12, 2010 at 5:23 pm

    How interesting, all the same clichés used in Vancouver to build SkyTrain: “shovel-ready and will generate jobs and assist local businesses by pouring federal monies into our economy.”

    Federal money = taxpayer’s money and I do hope that you are not being railroaded into a transit choice that my hinder transit expansion in the future and at the same bankrupt the transit authority.

    If your blog has caught the eye of the “powers that be”, good on you!

    Good luck, as Zwei will be keeping an eye on events as they unfold.

  • 2 John Roco // Oct 19, 2010 at 10:24 am

    Why spend $5.5 billion for a line that does not reduce jams, from key places jams begin?

    Why spend 5 times the $$$$$ for a line that does not reach Nanakuli, Heart of Kapolei, Ko Olina, Ewa, West Loch, nor in front of Plant on Leeward Coast, from where MANY jammed cars come?

    ‘Cut Costs Combine:’

    OR&L line + Light Rail + Bike Plan = 1/5 of $5.5 Billion

    Using existing resources, we can have ‘LIGHT Rail’(as we VOTED for). See my website, and click the tab ‘Cut Costs Combine.’ Thank you.


    John Roco

Leave a Comment