Remembering Martin Luther King

Thanks to FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting) for reprinting a 1995 column, “The Martin Luther King you still don’t see on TV.”

But after passage of civil rights acts in 1964 and 1965, King began challenging the nation’s fundamental priorities. He maintained that civil rights laws were empty without “human rights”–including economic rights. For people too poor to eat at a restaurant or afford a decent home, King said, anti-discrimination laws were hollow.

Noting that a majority of Americans below the poverty line were white, King developed a class perspective. He decried the huge income gaps between rich and poor, and called for “radical changes in the structure of our society” to redistribute wealth and power.

“True compassion,” King declared, “is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring.”

By 1967, King had also become the country’s most prominent opponent of the Vietnam War, and a staunch critic of overall U.S. foreign policy, which he deemed militaristic. In his “Beyond Vietnam” speech delivered at New York’s Riverside Church on April 4, 1967–a year to the day before he was murdered–King called the United States “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.”

From Vietnam to South Africa to Latin America, King said, the U.S. was “on the wrong side of a world revolution.” King questioned “our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America,” and asked why the U.S. was suppressing revolutions “of the shirtless and barefoot people” in the Third World, instead of supporting them.

Even after another 16 years, I think it’s fair to say we still don’t get the full picture from the mainstream media.

Democracy Now! featured King’s speech in its program last year (Jan 18, 2010). Worth watching.

2 responses to “Remembering Martin Luther King

  1. King’s words remain true, the “United States is STILL the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today.” Obama has continued the same violent policies to the great disappointment of millions who believed in the “audacity of hope”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.