More “target letters” sent by feds in police chief’s case

Hawaii News Now reported last night that the federal investigation of Honolulu Police Chief Louis Kealoha and his wife has taken another step forward (“More officers facing charges in federal investigation of HPD chief, wife“).

According to HNN:

According to sources, federal “target letters” have gone out to several people connected to the chief and his wife, Katherine Kealoha.

“When you become a target, you’re being told that you’ve committed a crime, and they’re investigating you and they want you to come in and talk to them,” said attorney William Harrison, represents one of those who received a target letter.

“It’s very serious,” he said, adding that he’s made contact with the federal prosecutor and the FBI agents handling the case.

Here a link to a sample “target letter.”

The sample letter says, in part:

We advise you that the Grand Jury is conducting an investigation of possible violations of federal criminal laws involving, but not necessarily limited to *. You are advised that the destruction or alteration of any document required to be produced before the grand jury constitutes serious violation of federal law, including but not limited to Obstruction of Justice.

You are advised that you are a target of the Grand Jury’s investigation. You may refuse to answer any question if a truthful answer to the question would tend to incriminate you. Anything that you do or say may be used against you in a subsequent legal proceeding.

An online search turns up lots of information about target letters.

One site warns:

“A “target letter” is just what it implies: You are likely going to be indicted, and you better act accordingly.

Another site explains that there are different levels of such letters, and the recipient might be either a “subject” or a “target”.

A grand jury subject is the gray area between a witness and a target. The United States Attorneys’ Manual defines a subject as “a person whose conduct is within the scope of the grand jury’s investigation.” It means that the government is not actively seeking your indictment but that the government may try to indict you in the future because you engaged in conduct connected to what the grand jury is investigating. Basically, the government has not made up its mind about you. You might be in trouble or you might not.

A grand jury target is someone who is likely to be indicted. According to the United States Attorney’s Manual, a target “is a person as to whom the prosecutor or the grand jury has substantial evidence linking him or her to the commission of a crime and who, in the judgment of the prosecutor, is a putative defendant.” This is the most serious category, and it means you are in serious trouble. The most likely outcome is that you will be indicted.

It now seems very clear that this grand jury investigation isn’t going away, and indictments seem likely.

It’s creating more tricky terrain for Mayor Kirk Caldwell just two months before the election.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “More “target letters” sent by feds in police chief’s case

  1. Daniel P

    Not sure why it’s “tricky terrain” for Caldwell. The Chief does not report to him not does he have the power to suspend or remove him. That’s the Commission’s job is it not?

    Reply
    1. Allen N.

      I concur. This is not a mayoral election issue for Caldwell…unless there’s some kind of a scandalous link between the chief and the mayor that has not been made public yet.

      I do wonder if there will be any fallout for Keith Kaneshiro and the prosecutor’s office, tho. Several months ago, Kaneshiro took the unusual step of harshly criticizing the federal investigation into the Kealohas, calling it unfair, a circus, and a parade. Was this effort to discredit the Feds simply an effort to defend his deputy (Katherine Kealoha?) Or is there more to it?

      Reply
  2. Shirley Hasenyager

    It just seems something else gone wrong in the City and County and the mayor is really involved, even if it is not his job to “police” the Chief.

    Reply
  3. t

    golden rule of Electioneering: Why go after someone when someone else can do it?

    Civil Beat September 7, 2016 · By Nick Grube
    Honolulu’s newest police commissioner turned Wednesday’s Honolulu Police Commission meeting into a detailed inquiry about the department’s lax handling of police misconduct.
    It was the first time Chief Louis Kealoha and other top police officials had been openly challenged by the commission about problems that have been repeatedly raised in other venues, including the media.
    Prior to Sheehan’s appointment, the commission had been reluctant to challenge the police chief on problems within the department, at least in open session. Kealoha and his wife are the subject of a federal corruption probe, a fact commission members wouldn’t even acknowledge for months.

    “From my personal perspective I’m happy that the police commission engaged in a robust public forum,” Sheehan said after the meeting. “This is how it’s supposed to be. We represent the citizens of the city and county, and we have an obligation to ask the chief questions.”

    No topic was off limits for Sheehan.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.