Category Archives: Computers

UH Manoa among campuses hit by anti-Semitic flyers

The University of Hawaii at Manoa was among the college campuses across the country where anti-Semitic flyers were printing out in department offices.

A copy of the flyer was found after printing out from a networked office printer in the UH-Manoa Women’s Studies Department Thursday morning, It was reported to campus officials, and campus IT staff were trying to trace its origin through the IP address recorded by the printer.

According to published accounts, the flyers campus networks had apparently been hacked, allowing the unsolicited printing.

According to the website,

The flyers turned out in printers at Smith College in Northampton, Mount Holyoke College in South Hadley, as well as Northeastern University in Boston, DePaul University in Chicago, Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey, and the University of Southern California, said Robert Trestan, executive director of the New England Anti-Defamation League.

The flyers urged people to “join us in the struggle for global white supremacy.”

They include a link to a neo-Nazi website featuring a headline, “Total Fascism”.

Trump’s torturous rhetoric

Donald Trump’s stunning advocacy of torture is the latest sign that the candidate has gone off the dangerous edge of his own flat-earth platform. He, and much of the rest of the GOP field of presidential candidates, appear hell bent on confirming the world’s worst possible views of what Americans are like.

Of course, torture is illegal. It’s considered illegal under U.S. law, and under our international obligations. And the fact that Trump doesn’t mind trumpeting his own more sadistic tendencies is a dismal indication of how low American political debate has fallen.

Here’s just a bit of the reporting on and reaction to his pro-war crimes campaign.

Trump and Cruz idiotically refuse to face the facts about torture,” from The Guardian via Raw Story.

There was once a consensus that torture was immoral; even today, any sensible person knows torture is of little use if you want accurate information. Yet the current crop of Republican presidential candidates have been trying to outbid one another with promises of barbarism: Senator Ted Cruz confirmed that he favours simulated drowning, which he classifies as an “enhanced interrogation technique” (EIT) that falls short of torture. (The Spanish Inquisition was rather more honest, and called it tortura del agua.) “The Donald” immediately trumped his rival : he would “bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding”.

Trump’s call to bring back torture alarms professional interrogators,” McClatchyDC.

Hard-nosed interrogators who say they’ve thwarted terror attacks in the United States by extracting key information from suspects have a message for Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner, who’s vowing to bring back waterboarding and even harsher questioning techniques if elected president:

Don’t do it.

Trump’s Impeachable Offense,” truth dig.

First, the federal Torture Act stipulates that if an American soldier, CIA officer, or anybody else acting on behalf of the government waterboards a prisoner, he risks up to 20 years imprisonment. The McCain-Feinstein Amendment Congress passed last year reiterated the ban on torture, including waterboarding.

Second, our country is a signatory to the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Waterboarding a prisoner is against international law and could subject the torturer — or the person ordering or approving the torture — to international sanctions, including prosecution in international courts.

CIA would refuse to comply with Trump’s torture order, former officials say,” Newsweek via RawStory.

Former CIA and FBI interrogators have said publicly that such measures not only violate Geneva Convention prohibitions on torture, but are not as effective in the long run as breaking down prisoners with other techniques. Frazier Thompson, who heads the federal unit that interrogates key terrorism suspects, added his voice to that message this week, telling NPR that “rapport-based techniques elicit the most credible information.”

Normalizing torture one interview at a time,” Digby’s Hullabaloo.

I’m sickened, literally, whenever I hear Trump say this stuff and get huge cheers. but why wouldn’t he? The media doesn’t see it as a problem. At this point I don’t know what depravity Trump could recommend to deal with terrorism that would make the press confront him to his face. It’s true they did get worked up about his making fun of a disabled reporter, which was revolting, so that’s promising. But they have a ways to go.

Draft-Dodger Trump Said Sleeping Around Was My ‘Personal Vietnam’“, The Daily Beast

In a 1997 interview with shock jock Howard Stern, Trump talked about how he had been “lucky” not to have contracted diseases when he was sleeping around.

“I’ve been so lucky in terms of that whole world. It is a dangerous world out there. It’s scary, like Vietnam. Sort of like the Vietnam-era,” Trump said in a video that resurfaced Tuesday on Buzzfeed, “It is my personal Vietnam. I feel like a great and very brave soldier.”

What do you think about concerns over Twitter’s slowing growth?

Do you use Twitter?

A lot of reporters have found it to be a very useful tool.

But is it about to be overtaken by other platforms? The financial press is pointing to some red flags.

The high-profile social media company’s latest financial report showed no growth in new users during the most recent quarter, and well behind earlier projections for the full year.

This has financial analysts fretting over the company’s future.

According to one recent article:

User growth remains stagnant, interaction is flat and, while revenues are up quarter over quarter, the company continues to lose money.

A Wall Street Journal column points to fine print in the “forward looking” portion of its financials, which has been quietly adding new future risks onto the public record (“For Twitter’s Troubles, Read the Fine Print“).

It notes:

Twitter adjusted its language around future risk. It now says that there’s the possible risk that its user base and engagement “do not grow or decline.” That phrase was swapped in for “do not continue to grow.” It also added a new possible risk that “Twitter’s strategies, priorities or plans take longer to execute than anticipated.”

As the column notes, “subtle additions to forward-looking statements can provide clues about what might eventually balloon into a bigger problem.”

But as Twitter users, what do you think? Does Twitter play as great a role for you as it did a year or two ago? Where does it sit in your list of useful applications and sites?

Assessing the city’s “open government” initiative

“Open data” is a great idea for state and local governments, providing a way for the public to easily access the mountains of data produced by governments at all levels. If it works, it provides ways to check what the city and state are actually doing and to hold elected officials accountable.

Elected officials have given lots of lip service to the idea over several years.

I wondered about the status of Hawaii’s open data initiatives, and decided to take a quick look at the city’s efforts. I’ll check on the state’s progress at another time.

In November 2013, the City Council passed Bill 53 (2013) regarding open data. It summarized the background of the open data movement.

The Council further finds that on June 26, 2012, the Governor issued an Executive Directive to all state department heads announcing the Open Data Initiative. On August 10, 2012, then-candidate and current Mayor Kirk Caldwell, signed an Open Data Pledge. On October 4, 2012, State Chief data officer Sanjeev Bhagowalia unveiled the State’s Twelve Year IT Transformation Plan, which included as one of its top priorities the establishment of a State open data portal at The City followed suit and created https://data.honolulu.qov. These actions enabled public facing websites to facilitate the sharing of master data sets. On July 3, 2013, the Governor signed into law Act 263, which relates to open data. This new law requires state executive branch departments to make electronic data sets available to the public, absolves the State from liability for certain deficiencies or incomplete data, and requires the Chief data officer to develop policies and procedures to implement the open data initiative.

Finally, the Council finds that an open data policy has been shown to drive increased government efficiency and civic engagement, leading to social and economic benefits as a result of innovative citizen interaction with government. Social and economic benefits include, but are not limited to, empowering citizens through the democratization of information and fostering citizen participation in city government projects, supporting early stage entrepreneurship, encouraging positive environments that contribute to workforce development and job creation, and fostering a positive business environment and public-private partnerships.

Sounds good, doesn’t it?

The bill provides:

Each agency shall use reasonable efforts to make appropriate and existing electronic data sets maintained by the agency electronically available at no cost to the public through the city’s open data portal at or its successor website designated by the city’s director of information technology….

As with lots of great sounding measures, there were several caveats. This seems to be the main one.

Nothing in this chapter shall require agencies to create new electronic data sets or to make data sets available upon demand…

I’ve just started to spot check what’s actually available at You can click on the link for a full catalog of available data. Since the list of available data sets is so large, dig in and share your observations with the rest of us.

Here’s my initial take.

Some of these data sources actually deliver on the promise. For example, the database of traffic incidents spans a period from 2012 through the present. That makes it possible to go back and spot problem areas, spots where more incidents are reported, etc.

Data on abandoned vehicles also covers a broad time period from 2007 to just the last couple of days.

But the database of “Crime Incidents” is described as “an active feed from the Honolulu Police Department.” But the last entries appear to be from August 22, 2015, where the data abruptly stops. So it’s almost complete, but somewhere along the line the ball was dropped.

Other data are much more limited. The Honolulu 311 reports are online. These are complaints or requests for service submitted using the Honolulu311 mobile app. When it was launched, this service got positive press.

But for some unknown reason, the online data only contain items submitted in the past month. That leaves no way to track the city’s performance over time, to identify problem areas, or the most frequent types of problems.

Some data looked interesting, but the links didn’t work, at least when I was checking. One promises to identify all state owned land. It provided an external link, which returned only an error message. A list of city owned properties couldn’t be opened without a county id and password.

Some databases are simple snapshots in time. For example, “Hanauma Bay Revenues FY14 2013-12-31.” Separate databases report revenues and expenditures at Hanauma over several fiscal years. That would at least make it possible to compile a time series to track changes or trends. Same with city budgets, reported in discrete files by year.

There’s a useful link for shoreline access points, which opens a map of Oahu with public access points shown as red dots. Click on one of them and you get a description of it.

Here’s one that might yield something interesting. It is apparently a list of the top ten internet sites accessed from each city department, but only covered the single month of Dec 2012. An updated list over time would certainly be of public interest!

In any case, there are hundreds of listed sources of data, but the list appears to contain lots of duplicates. Much of the data should be useful, others not so much.

But there doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to what’s in this collection of data, nor any sense that city departments are making progress in opening large datasets to the public.

I’ve seen some mainland jurisdictions provide access to the city’s checkbook, allowing micro-level analysis of departmental spending.

I searched for the term “contracts.” The only items found were city budgets. A search for “procurement” produced nothing. Of course, there are separate city systems for procurement matters, and I know lists of personal service contracts are provided regularly to the city council. But accessing these in the form of a database would make analysis of the lists easier and more likely for someone to undertake.

The other thing I notice is that few people make any use of these data. Only a handful of the thousand or so slices of city data have been accessed ore than a few hundred times since 2012. These seem to have been the most heavily used.

But even here there are problems.

Anyway, here are the most used databases, using the city’s numbers.


The challenge of backing up digital photos in the cloud

For several days, I’ve been experimenting with using Amazon Cloud to store backups of my large collection of digital photos.

If you’re mainly dealing with pictures taken with your smartphone, you probably haven’t gotten to an unwieldy number of photos yet. But I’ve got quite a mountain of them.

I bought my first small digital camera in late 1998, and have gone through many generations of cameras since then. I’ve mostly relied on Canon digitals, but along the way used a couple of Nikons, and recently added a used Sony RX1, a small digital full frame camera. The result is tens of thousands of at-risk digital pictures.

Right now, I rely on a stack of portable hard drives containing photos back to around 2004. Initially, I had a primary storage drive and a backup drive for each year or two. For several recent years, I’ve used a RAID drive that automatically saves my photos onto two separate disks. And this year I added a third copy on a separate portable drive. Earlier pictures, starting at the end of 1998, were burned onto CDs.

But there’s always the fear. What if the house burns down, or a hurricane hits? What if something destroys the hard drives? Having another layer of backup copies stored online seems the way to go.

So on with the experiment. Amazon Prime Photos was my choice. Google offers a similar, highly rated service. But I’m already an Amazon Prime member, and their file storage is really a great deal. The price is now about $100 a year to join Prime, but you get free shipping on most items purchased through Amazon. If you shop online, shipping to Hawaii can often be exorbitant. Amazon Prime usually offers an easy way to avoid those issues. And Prime membership also includes Amazon streaming video, music, and a few other benefits.

Then, not long ago, Amazon added unlimited storage of digital photos in a variety of formats. If you aren’t a Prime member, you can buy unlimited photo storage for just $2 a month. Unlimited file storage of all kinds–photo, video, and document files–currently costs just $5 a month.

I should mention that Amazon’s terms of service limit their system to personal, noncommercial use. You can’t set up your Amazon backup to serve photos to a website, if I understand their conditions. And you can’t resell any of your own unlimited storage.

In any case, a few days ago I signed up for photo storage and started uploading pictures.

I pulled a one of my backup hard drives at random. It turned out to be photos from 2008-2009. You can upload via the web, or using an Amazon Cloud app that runs on my Mac (Windows versions also available).

So far, I’ve uploaded about 150 GB containing something like 15,000 photos, plus some video. It’s a slow slog.

Broadband speeds are not speedy when it comes to this many files. And, unfortunately, the Amazon photo storage isn’t automated.

You upload either through a desktop app, using a web browser, or photos can be uploaded directly from your phone. Amazon automatically organizes your photos by date, using the embedded descriptive data.

It’s relatively straightforward, but time consuming.

Here’s what I’ve done. First, I realized that wifi is too slow. So I ran an ethernet cable from the Hawaiian Tel broadband connection that’s up in one of our closets, and plugged it into my travel laptop. I’ve just been letting that run as an upload machine. Every couple of hours, if I remember, I stop by and set up another batch of pictures to be uploaded. I’m still trying to figure out the most efficient way to do these uploads. I’ve read about another app for automating the process, and I’ll probably go looking for a solution like that soon.

In the meantime, here’s the good side of things. The photos are stored in their original format at full size. I’ve read that files can’t exceed 2 GB in size, which isn’t a constraint for anything that I do. I’m not sure if that applies to video, at least if you’ve signed up for the unlimited photo AND video option.

Log onto your Amazon account, and you’ll see small versions of the most recent photos, with an option to jump to a particular year. Once there, yearly photos are arranged by month and, I presume, by date. I’ve discovered that some file formats, including the digital negative format, will only display an embedded thumbnail of the image. To see a full size rendering, you have to download that image. Yes, not perfect. But for redundant backup purposes, it doesn’t seem like a major limitation.

And all the photos become immediately available from my computer, phone, or tablet, or anyplace where I can access the internet. I’ve only used the Mac version, along with iPhone and iPad, but I understand they all run on other platforms as well.

You can also share individual photos via email

When I finish uploading all the files on the first drive covering 2008-2009, I’ll have to assess how long it will take to get all my photos into the cloud. Clearly it will take a while, may be months to get the whole backlog online, unless I can figure out how to get the process a bit more automated.

Using hard drive storage, there’s software to simply make a backup clone of a drive. It might take a while to physically make the copy, but it doesn’t take any more human intervention. Just come back when its done.

This process of uploading individual folders and files takes more work. I haven’t tried selecting all the files on a drive and moving them over to Amazon in one giant batch.

That’s all part of the experiment, I guess.

If you’ve got any experience using Amazon, Google Drive, or other ways of doing large scale photo backup, I would be most interested in your experience.