Category Archives: General

Looking back at 1947: Leaders of clubs & organizations

I was surprised to take a close look at a bookshelf here in the house and find a hardbound copy of Who’s Who in the Territory of Hawaii, 1947 edition. That’s the year I was born, which probably accounts for why I bought this is in a used bookstore years ago.

In the back of the book, after all the brief biographies puffing up people’s social status and importance, there’s a separate section of clubs and organizations, with lists of their officers and boards.

It’s interesting in so many ways, even though I don’t know much about any of the people (although I’ve started combing through newspapers.com for background info on some of them.

How was the order of the groups determined? The criteria are hard to discern.

For example, four organizations appear on the first page of the listing. Were they considered to be the most influential? Most connected? Or randomly chosen?

In order:

Oahu Country Club
Morning Music Club
PEO Reciprocity Bureau of Hawaii
The Pacific Club in Hawaii

Two of them–Oahu Country Club and the Pacific Club–are still prominent organizations.

But the other two?

It didn’t take long to find that the Morning Music Club, like the Outdoor Circle, was a spinoff of the Kilohana Art League, an organization of artists and supporters of the arts that began in 1894 and was disbanded in 1912. During its existence, the Kilohana Art League was well known for organizing public exhibitions promoting Hawaii artists.

I’ve found only short references to the Morning Music Club, which held monthly meetings for local musicians and singers. It was founded in 1905 and led by Mary Atherton Richards, the granddaughter of missionaries Amos Starr Cooke and Juliette Montague Cooke.

According to Google:

The Morning Music Club was created to serve as a meeting point for local musicians in Honolulu, who were active in the city’s burgeoning music scene. Its founder, Mary Atherton Richards, was a prominent civic leader whose family had deep roots in the city.

A private, social setting: Early music organizations in Honolulu were often small and held in private homes or smaller venues. The Morning Music Club appears to have followed this trend, with meetings frequently held in Richards’ home, a testament to her family’s social standing.

In the Who’s Who list, the Morning Music Club’s officers don’t have names. They are listed only as the “Mrs.” associated with their husband’s names. A sign of the times, I suppose, although not all groups handled their officer names the same way.

In May 1908, the Pacific Commercial Advertiser called the group “one of the most progressive and interesting musical organizations of Honolulu….”

The thirty ladies who make up its
membership are working quietly but
effectively from an intelligent as well
as a musical standpoint. Some of
them are teachers, others have had
thorough musical educations, and some
are still students, but all unite in en-
deavoring to raise ideals and aid one
another by kindly criticism. The
newly-elected president, Mrs. Frank
Atherton, is well qualified in every
way to carry out with success the in-
teresting and educational program al-
ready arranged for the season of
1908-09.

Last evening at the Castle Free Kin-
dergarten the club gave their annual
open meeting, presenting a most
pleasurable program, for which they
deserve warm praise.

The results of earnest and good work
were shown throughout the evening.
The violin quartet was unique and ex-
ceedingly well handled. Mrs. Weight’s
solo, although it did not give her op-
portunity to display the power of her
lovely voice, was well interpreted and
showed a warmth and sweetness of
tone. The aria by Mrs. C. B. Cooper
deserves especial mention, as it was
by far the most difficult vocal number
on the program, Her singing shows
cultivation and control far beyond the
ordinary.

The last number on the program was
assuredly the climax of excellence, for
Mrs. Ingalls showed emphatically the
finish of the professional. Her audi-
tors constantly remark on the vast
improvement she has made since her
studies of last summer with Heer-
man. Her execution is brilliant and
exact, while her interpretation seems
to be always broadening and deepen-
ing. She graciously responded to an
enthusiastic encore. Miss Werthmuel-
ler, who accompanied Mrs. Ingalls,
displayed a delicacy of touch and
feeling which makes one wish she
would more often treat us to a hearing
of her exceptional talent in solo work.

When one considers that the follow-
ing program was given by ladies who,
with a few exceptions, are arnateurs
in every sense, we have reason to feel
proud of the fact that such a musical
club exists in Honolulu.

A search for more recent newspaper references to the Morning Music Club mostly turned up obituaries of former members.

State business registration records show “The Morning Music Club” was registered with the territory in 1952, a year after Mary Atherton Richards’ death. In 1961, the name was changed to The Morning Music Club of Honolulu. It has filed annual reports with the state every year until 2022, but has been listed as “delinquent” for the last three years and could be on the verge of being administratively terminated.

And the PEO Reciprocity Bureau of Hawaii? That’s proving to be harder to find information about.

In any case, if you’re interested in such things, take a look through the organizations that were considered to be signifant in 1947. I’ll add a few other comments later.

Officers & Directors of Clubs and Organizations in Hawaii (1947) by Ian Lind

Trump enters unknown territory by promoting war against foreign targets and American cities alike

If you’re as worried as I am about this turn of events, here’s roundup of news and comments regarding the lethal U.S. military attack on a small open Venezuelan boat carrying civilians in international waters. The word “unprecedented” comes to mind.

Lawfare Media: “Did the President’s Strike on Tren de Aragua Violate the Law?

By targeting narcotics traffickers with lethal force—even when interdiction, by Rubio’s account, was an available option—the Trump administration has taken the tools of warfare and applied them to a group that the United States has historically sought to protect from such targeting: civilians, even when engaged in harmful and criminal behavior. Doing so raises substantial questions of domestic and international law. They, in turn, raise even more questions about the president’s constitutional authority to undertake such actions in the first place.

[This is an exhaustive review of the applicable domestic and military law, as well as historic policy context. Well worth the effort to read through at least once.]

GOP Senator Rand Paul (quoted in The Guardian):

The Republican senator Rand Paul, who chairs the Senate committee on homeland security and government affairs, condemned Vance’s comments.

“JD ‘I don’t give a shit’ Vance says killing people he accuses of a crime is the ‘highest and best use of the military.’ Did he ever read To Kill a Mockingbird?” Paul wrote on X, alluding to Harper Lee’s 1960 novel about a wrongly convicted Black man who is killed as he tries to escape prison.

“Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial or representation? What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.”

JustSecurity.com (based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law)

As a legal matter, the Coast Guard is the primary maritime law enforcement agency of the United States, with broad authorities under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act and the Drug Trafficking Vessel Interdiction Act. Indeed, for the past several decades, the U.S. Coast Guard and other law enforcement agencies have taken the lead in combating maritime drug smuggling, a persistent problem in the Caribbean. The Navy and other military forces assist the Coast Guard in detecting and monitoring drug vessels headed to the United States. Although not perfect, this strategy allows the U.S. military to prioritize the capabilities it needs to fight wars, while tapping into the Coast Guard’s deep law enforcement experience.

The military’s supporting role in counternarcotics missions makes sense: the Coast Guard has broad legal authorities under U.S. domestic law as well as the requisite expertise in the nuances of evidence collection and boarding boats to lead the maritime interdiction mission. The U.S. Navy and other military assets have historically played a critical role in assisting with detection and monitoring drug activity, and they certainly have not preemptively attacked alleged drug vessels.

Indeed, under its broad statutory authorities under Title 14, the Coast Guard—but not the Navy or other military services—possesses the legal authority to search, seize property, and arrest persons suspected of violating U.S. law upon the high seas and waters over which the United States has jurisdiction. And these law enforcement boarding teams follow strict rules for use of force, relying on warning and disabling shots. Even these non-deadly actions must take place under strict conditions with higher-level approval.

Detailed Coast Guard instructions, as well as guidance found in the military’s law of naval operations, prescribe in great detail the use of force policy for Coast Guard personnel when conducting counterdrug operations. The use of force measures include when warning shots and disabling fire are authorized.

The Telegraph (via Yahoo News)

Anna Kelly, White House spokesman, said the strike was “conducted against the operations of a designated terrorist organisation and was taken in defence of vital US national interests”.

It was “fully consistent” with the laws of war, she added.

Legal analysts say her comments reflect a 2001 determination that the US was at war with al-Qaeda after the 9/11 attacks. That made its operatives “combatants” and legal targets under international and domestic law.

However, no such determination has been made about Tren de Aragua. Labelling it “terrorist” means the president has the authority to impose financial and legal sanctions but does not make its members “combatants”.

“I worked at the department of defence. I literally cannot imagine lawyers coming up with a legal basis for lethal strike of a suspected Venezuelan drug boat,” said Ryan Goodman, retired professor of law.

“Hard to see how this would not be ‘murder’ or war crime under international law that DoD considers applicable.”

BBC: “US strike on ‘Venezuela drug boat’: What do we know, and was it legal?

Experts have also questioned whether the killing of the alleged members of the Tren de Aragua cartel could contravene international law on the use of force.

Under Article 2(4) of the UN charter, countries can resort to force when under attack and deploying their military in self-defence. Trump has previously accused the Tren de Aragua cartel of conducting irregular warfare against the US, and the state department has designated the group as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation.
But Prof Michael Becker of Trinity College Dublin told BBC Verify that the US actions “stretches the meaning of the term beyond its breaking point”.

“The fact that US officials describe the individuals killed by the US strike as narco-terrorists does not transform them into lawful military targets,” he said. “The US is not engaged in an armed conflict with Venezuela or the Tren de Aragua criminal organization.”

“Not only does the strike appear to have violated the prohibition on the use of force, it also runs afoul of the right to life under international human rights law.”

Prof Moffett said that the use of force in this case could amount to an “extrajudicial arbitrary killing” and “a fundamental violation of human rights”.

“Labelling everyone a terrorist does not make them a lawful target and enables states to side-step international law,” he said.

Notre Dame Law School Professor Mary Ellen O’Connell told BBC Verify that the strike “violated fundamental principles of international law”, adding: “Intentional killing outside armed conflict hostilities is unlawful unless it is to save a life immediately.”

Excerpt from an excellent Facebook post by Glee Violette

They did not board the boat. They did not collect evidence. They did not even have an accurate head count. Not one of them has been identified. Do they have ANY of the names ? Even now? No.
So how could they possibly know if they were gang members?

Or if, as some have suggested, the boat was full of refugees fleeing Venezuela, like hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans have done already. Maybe speeding TOWARDS the US Navy ships hoping to find refuge and safety under our protection.

After all, there were 11 to 13 people aboard that boat. The number differs, because the boat was not close enough to tell. Nor could the gender of the people be determined. Or if there were children on board.

One thing is for sure. If there were so many people on board such a small vessel, there was not much room for a drug shipment. Was there?

And one more worth watching: Lawfare Live

Where are they now?

Here’s a list of those defendants caught up in the federal investigation of Mike Miske, who was convicted last year on 13 federal charges ranging from racketeering conspiracy to kidnapping, assault, and conspiracy to commit murder.

I checked to see where these Miske associates are now, relying mostly on the Bureau of Prisons online inmate locator.

Jarrin Young was sentenced in January 2024 to 42 months, the time he had already served while in Honolulu’s Federal Detention Center. The 42 months was more than the sentencing range recommended in his sentencing report. Judge Derrick Watson ordered him released “forthwith.”

Dae Han Moon’s location is listed as “unknown.” However, he is currently under the jurisdiction of the State of Hawaii, and is serving out the remaining time after being convicted of the murder of Stevie Feliciano at Ala Moana Center on Christmas 2016. In the Miske case, Moon was sentenced to 34 months months for joining a conspiracy to kill a Waimanalo man believed to have been cooperating with law enforcement and providing information on Miske’s operation. This sentence is to run concurrently with the remaining state sentence. Moon will then serve an additional 60 months in federal prison for using a handgun in the commission of a drug crime.

Three of Miske’s associates do not currently appear in the federal inmate locator–Harry Kauhi, Jacob “Jake” Smith, and Jonah Ortiz. Smith is believed to be in protective custody in an undisclosed location. All three cut deals with prosecutors in which they agreed to coooperate by testifying against others in the Miske case.

Name: MICHAEL J MISKE
Register Number: 12248-122
Age: 51
Race: White
Sex: Male
Release Date: UNKNOWN
Location: Not in BOP custody
[Deceased]

Name: JOHN STANCIL
Register Number: 12250-122
Age: 38
Race: White
Sex: Male
Release Date: 07/30/2037
Located At: FCI Terminal Island

Name: KAULANA FREITAS
Register Number: 12251-122
Age: 37
Race: White
Sex: Male
Release Date: 03/26/2026
Located At: FCI Lompoc II

Name: LANCE BERMUDEZ
Register Number: 10795-122
Age: 34
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: UNKNOWN
Located At: FDC Honolulu

Name: DAE HAN MOON
Register Number: 11357-122
Age: 29
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: UNKNOWN
Location: Not in BOP custody

Name: PRESTON M KIMOTO
Register Number: 12252-122
Age: 46
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: 11/08/2025
Located At: RRM Sacramento

Name: MICHAEL J BUNTENBAH
Register Number: 12249-122
Age: 53
Race: White
Sex: Male
Release Date: 05/24/2026
Located At: FCI Sheridan

Name: NORMAN L AKAU
Register Number: 12254-122
Age: 52
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: 06/19/2032
Located At: FDC Honolulu

Name: HUNTER J WILSON
Register Number: 12253-122
Age: 29
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: 02/11/2028
Located At: FCI Safford

Name: JARRIN KALANI YOUNG
Register Number: 11096-122
Age: 31
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Not in BOP Custody as of: 01/23/2024
[Sentenced to time served (42 months) and released after sentencing]

Name: DELIA FABRO-MISKE
Register Number: 12486-122
Age: 31
Race: Asian
Sex: Female
Release Date: 04/13/2031
Located At: FCI Aliceville

Name: JASON K YOKOYAMA
Register Number: 58327-509
Age: 39
Race: Asian
Sex: Male
Release Date: 05/28/2026
Located At: FCI Sheridan

Name: WAYNE MILLER
Register Number: 94584-510
Age: 42
Race: White
Sex: Male
Release Date: UNKNOWN
Location: Not in BOP custody

Name: HARRY KAUHI [No info in inmate locator]

Name: JACOB LL SMITH [No info in inmate locator]

Name: JONAH M ORTIZ [No info in inmate locator]

Fiddlesticks!

I’ve long known the term “fiddlesticks,” which according to a typical dictionary definition is a slang term used to express nonsense, disagreement, annoyance, or dismissal.

How did I reach age 78 without knowing that fiddlesticks are a part of old-timey fiddle music?!

Now that I see them in action, I recognize the sound as a familiar part of many fiddle recordings I’ve enjoyed over the years.