Category Archives: Media

Yes, Israel is committing genocide Gaza

This criticism of reporting by the NY Times is from the organization Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, known as FAIR.

The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) passed a resolution on August 31 declaring that Israel has been committing genocide in Gaza, with 86% of voting members in agreement.

The declaration by the group, described as “the world’s biggest academic association of genocide scholars” (Reuters, 9/1/25), was widely seen as significant news. Prominent US media sources like CNN (9/1/25), NBC (9/1/25), ABC (9/2/25), CBS (9/3/25), PBS (9/1/25), NPR (9/2/25), AP (9/2/25), Time (9/1/25) and Newsweek (9/1/25) published stories on the IAGS resolution. They bore headlines like the Washington Post’s “Israel Is Committing Genocide in Gaza, Leading Scholars’ Association Says” (9/1/25). So, too, did numerous international news sources, with the BBC (9/1/25) running the headline “Israel Committing Genocide in Gaza, World’s Leading Experts Say.”

But the New York Times (9/1/25), which has repeatedly come under fire for its bias against Palestinians during Israel’s two-year-long rampage in Gaza, buried the news in the 31st paragraph of a story headlined “Israel’s Push for a Permanent Gaza Deal May Mean a Longer War, Experts Say.” The article immediately followed the brief mention of the IAGS resolution with a response from the Israeli government that called it an “an embarrassment to the legal profession,” and “entirely based on Hamas’s campaign of lies and the laundering of those lies by others.”

Read the full post (“NYT Buries News That Experts on Genocide Say Israel Is Committing It“).

A birth announcement

Here’s an item I shared on Facebook, and the positive reaction leads me to reposts it here.

Still digging through old scans, I came across this 78-year old telegram that my dad sent to his mother in Long Beach, California, letting her know about the birth of his son.

The cable was brief and to the point. It did not go further to explain that I entered the world two months prematurely, and at that time my mother’s physician advised my parents not to select a name immediately, because that would make it more difficult emotionally if I didn’t survive. And, at least based on that advice, it would seem that the odds of survival were not in my favor. Perhaps that back story was included in the letter that followed. I don’t know.

Think about how different the world was then. No instant text messaging. No phone in your pocket capable of inexpensive international calls. At that time, even a brief telephone call to announce a birth to your parents was prohibitively expensive!

This message cost $5.75 to send.

According to the all-knowing internet, that would be just over $83 in 2025 dollars.

I’ll bet today’s college students have no clue that long-distance communications relied on this and other long-gone methods.

According to an online history of cable communications, Commercial Pacific Cable Company was a collaboration founded in 1901.

The Commercial Pacific Cable Company was formed by a collaboration of the Commercial Cable Company, the Great Northern Telegraph Company, and the Eastern Telegraph Company, with the goal of laying a cable across the Pacific Ocean from America’s west coast.

Founded in 1901, the company provided the first direct telegraph route from America to the Philippines, China, and Japan. Prior to this, messages had to travel across the Atlantic to the Far East via Capetown and the Indian Ocean, or via London to Russia, then across the Russian landline to Vladivostock, then by submarine cable to Japan and the Philippines.

The same history notes that the link between San Francisco and Honolulu was “the first and most significant section,” and was laid down in 1902.

The company ceased operations in October 1951 and was merged into AT&T.

Google’s AI explained several reasons why telegrams have not yet completely disappeared.

Why telegrams are still sent

Legal Purposes:
Telegrams are a strong, legally recognized document for matters like contract cancellations or other legal notifications because the service keeps a time-stamped copy for verification in court.

Formal Communication:
They are considered a formal way to send important messages and are seen as more official than emails or text messages, notes Quora.

Special Occasions:
Telegrams are used to mark significant social events like weddings, graduations, or to express sympathy for deaths, offering a unique and memorable way to celebrate or express feelings.

Urgency and Importance:
They are still considered the “gold standard” for urgent, official, or significant messages, notes Atlas Obscura.

How telegrams are sent today
Online ordering: Most services allow you to order and send a telegram online.
Hand-delivery: The message is still printed on paper and hand-delivered to the recipient’s door, often in a sealed envelope.

Company services: Companies like International Telegram, American Telegram, and others operate the former Western Union network, providing the infrastructure for these messages to be sent across the globe.

Betting on the future of newspapers

The publisher of the 157-year-old Atlanta Journal-Constitution announced yesterday that the newspaper will cease its print edition at the end of this year. Beginning January 1, the newspaper will be distributed in digital form only.

There was an effort to put a positive spin on the change.

Relying on printing presses and delivery trucks to distribute the news simply isn’t the best way for the AJC to serve you anymore. In addition, this decision has a positive impact on the environment – saving water and trees, eliminating the use of polybags and CO2, and diverting waste from the landfill – which is in line with Cox’s commitment to sustainability.

The AJC is owned by Cox Enterprises, now a conglomerate that also owns the news site Axios, two newspapers in Ohio where the company started, as well as a number of other well-known businesses.

The newspaper reported its print circulation peaked at more than 600,000 in the early 2000s, and it now has about 115,000 subscribers, with about 40,000 still receiving the printed paper (down from 94,000 over the past five years).

The New York Times reported that a majority of U.S. newspapers no longer distribute a print edition seven days a week. The Honolulu Advertiser, for example, offers subscribers a choice of whether to have the print edition delivered six days a week, four days a week, or digital only.

Roughly a third of the country’s more than 1,000 remaining daily newspapers still print seven days a week, according to a 2024 report on the state of local news by Northwestern University. Many others have reduced their print frequency to cut costs: The same study found that about 180 newspapers that had once printed daily put out newspapers fewer than three days a week.

The Times also pointed the finger at the unanticipated impact that AI has had on media. With Google and other search sites offering summaries of search findings along with specific links, traffic generated for newspapers by online searches has fallen dramatically.

A headline from Editor & Publisher put AJC’s move into perspective: “The AJC is betting its future on digital alone. That gamble could save millions — or cost the paper its base.”

But the move to digital-only was not a surprise. NPR reported that the AJC has been preparing for the digital transformation for years and at that time claimed a $150 million budget to underwrite the move.

TravelBlogue/Auckland: Doppelganger

On Friday, August 1, I received a Google alert flagging the appearance of my name in an online publication.

But it took only a quick glance to realize that this story of a garden featured another Ian Lind, one who lives here in New Zealand’s North Island.

I sent a message off to the author of the story, asking if he would forward a message off to the NZ Ian Lind.

On Monday, the author let me know that he would pass my message along.

Now I wait, hoping that Ian Lind will reply.

Could this be another Lind cousin?

I’m hoping to get a response so that we can check it out.