Category Archives: Planning

Breathing new life in urban bus systems

“Love the bus, Save your city.”

That’s the theme of a new series launched by CityLab, and delivered as part of “CityLab Daily,” their daily newsletter.

They’re not necessarily selling the idea of buses as an alternative to the expensive rail systems such the one that we’re saddled with here in Honolulu, but that’s certainly what the idea of a well-funded and planned bus system offers. But it makes sense even as a companion to rail in a broader urban transit plan.

If you care about how well your city moves, how your local economy is faring, and how the planet’s future fares, then you care about your city bus. And you care about making the bus better. You want to see your bus as a piece of social infrastructure that your whole city can take pride in—a sign of prestige, not decay.

Because it turns out that when rubber-tired fleets are treated as a mighty social good, people willingly hop on. See the Minneapolis “A Line,” where buses are essentially held to the standards of rail service: They get first-go at traffic lights, accept boardings at every door, and stop every half mile, rather than every block. Look at all of the cities following the example of Houston, which overhauled its bus route network in 2015 and saw a 15 percent Saturday ridership spike in the first year; Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, and New York City are all taking their cues. And look, perhaps most of all, at San Francisco, Phoenix, and Seattle, the only major cities where bus ridership meaningfully ticked up last year. All have city-wide plans to fund and improve service. What’s been missing in most cities is this type of attention.

The intro essay includes several links, including these:

Washington Post, “Metro is mulling a major redesign of the bus system. But first, officials need to figure out why people aren’t riding.”

The Inquirer (Philadelphia), “SEPTA looks to Texas for ideas for bus route redesign.”

Government Technology, “Bus Network Redesigns Are the ‘Hottest Trend in Transit‘”

Interesting stuff.

If you’re wondering about CityLab, here’s a description excerpted from its frequently asked questions.

CityLab is dedicated to the people who are creating the cities of the future—and those who want to live there. Through sharp analysis, original reporting, and visual storytelling, our coverage focuses on the biggest ideas and most pressing issues facing the world’s metro areas and neighborhoods.

CityLab, originally called The Atlantic Cities, was launched in September 2011. CityLab rebranded in May 2014 with a new site and an expanded editorial mission. The current version of the site was launched in June 2017, highlighting a new focus on five areas of urban coverage—design, transportation, environment, equity, and life—as well as a new Solutions hub to collect the best ideas and stories for an urbanizing world.

Another ruling against Haseko in case of abandoned marina

Homeowners in Haseko’s Ocean Pointe development, now part of what is known as Hoakalei, will have choice of rescinding their original purchases for full price plus interest and attorneys fees, or keep their homes and share in $20 million to be paid by Haseko.

That’s the bottom line of a ruling issued yesterday by First Circuit Court Judge Karen Nakasone in a long-running class-action lawsuit dating back to 2013.

The plaintiffs alleged that they bought their homes, at least in part, because of Haseko’s promised marina. The lure of living adjacent to a world class marina was used to advertise the project for years. Later, however, Haseko quietly abandoned the marina plan. A number of homeowners joined in the lawsuit, which was later certified as a class action.

In an order accompanying Nakasone’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the judge ruled that members of the class of buyers “may elect to void their sales contract with Haseko for their home, and recover the full amount paid, with interest, together with all taxable cases and reasonable attorneys fees.”

Homeowners will have the option of keeping their homes, but sharing in $20 million to be paid by Haseko for “unjust enrichment.”

The case has been bouncing around in court since a 2015 ruling awarding the plaintiff’s $20 million in damages.

Matt Lopresti, now a state representative, was the lead plaintiff in the case.

I haven’t yet had chance to fully review Judge Nakasone’s ruling. More later.

Segregation in transit oriented development

[Apologies for my pre-caffeine version of this post that attributed this story to a different publication. Thank goodness for the post-coffee edit!]

Thanks to the Civil Beat’s Natanya Friedheim for an excellent story this morning describing a developer’s proposal to tap into special permissive zoning rules by claiming to provide transit oriented development. If approved, the building, located in the prime Keeaumoku Street corridor near Ala Moana Center, would be taller than any of the surrounding buildings and be allowed to build to a higher density than generally permitted in the area. In exchange, 20% of the buildings 429 units would be designed as rental units for those making 80% or less of Honolulu’s median income (for a single person, $58,600, and for a family of four, $83,680).

According to Friedheim, the building would be allowed “to exceed the neighborhood’s height limit by 150 feet and nearly quadruple the allowed density, among other zoning exemptions.”

See: “‘Poor Door’: Separate Tower Entrance Planned For Lower-Income Residents“.

Friedheim describes the zinger in the deal–the developer proposes a separate entrance for those renting the “affordable” apartments. Instant segregation!

Check out her story if you have a chance. It’s poses some difficult questions.

From the story:

The accommodations afforded each group of residents vary as widely as the income gap between them. Renters won’t have access to certain amenities, including a dog park, a pool, cabanas and a barbecue area.

“The renters won’t have to face the burden of maintaining all those amenities because they will be separated,” Simonich said.

He added that the entrance and lobby to the affordable units would be well designed. ProsPac Tower would include two separate elevators dedicated to accessing affordable units, which Simonich said will be more convenient for the tenants than having them share elevators with the condo owners.

He also said the neighborhood itself should be considered an amenity for all the residents.

Whoa. It’s not like an apartment “dog park” with its patch of artificial turf or a couple of BBQs and a seating area would be a high-cost add-on.

And it’s not as if this group of potential renters–those making up to 80% of the median–are the real impoverished in town. These might be the sons and daughters of those who will be buying market priced condos in the building.

If I were going to permit quadruple density and a 60% increase in allowable building height, I would want all of those 429 units to be designated affordable. You just know that this is going to set a precedent and become a floor for future proposals.

It started with a tree

A couple of weeks ago, I got an email complaining about an apparent sunshine law violation at the city council. It occurred when an item was added at the very last minute to the agenda of the Honolulu City Council. It seemed at first glance to be a minor item, a gift to put lights on a tree in a Hawaii Kai park. But it turned out there was a lot more going on.

I told the story in a column posted today at Civil Beat (“Ian Lind: Why A Tree In Hawaii Kai Is Raising Questions Of Favoritism“).

While questions about the tree lights started with their unauthorized appearance last year, they have continued to the present, along with a sense among a number of community leaders and organizations that they have been bypassed during the nearly year-long discussions of the lights.

There are additional questions about privatizing parks by turning over their care and control to private parties, no matter how well intentioned.

Critics also cite environmental concerns, noting that the designated tree is located just feet from the high water mark, where electrical power could create unanticipated safety hazards. They also note that installing lights so close to the ocean could run afoul of laws restricting shoreline lighting, and run counter to efforts to protect the dark night sky from further light pollution.

And the Office of Information Practices is reviewing a complaint that lack of public notice of the council’s final vote to accept the gift violated the state’s Sunshine Law.

“It’s a tough issue for something that seems so small, lighting a tree,” commented Kenny Amazaki, senior advisor and chief of staff for council member Ozawa.

A tough issue. Yes it is.

The column is a bit long, but I hope you find it an interesting read.