Another lesson in genetic genealogy

When I logged on to the Ancestry.com account a week or so ago, and found an interesting item waiting.

It was from ThruLines, a tool Ancestry offers that reviews the family tree that you have compiled, compares it to others seeking overlaps, and then cross-checks against DNA results. In this case it notified me that I have a DNA with several people who also appear to share a common ancestor, my great-great-great grandfather, John Galt.

This seemed to mean that we are related on paper, according to our respective family trees, confirmed by DNA results.

The most interesting thing for me is that two of the three matches appear to be part Maori, and I’ve been searching for clues about how I came to have lots of distance Maori DNA cousins. So this latest item seemed to be a breakthrough.

I quickly sent off emails seeking to share info on what appear to be our family ties.

One person responded. According to our family trees, it appears that Amy’s mother can also trace herself back to the same John Galt, born around 1770.

Aha, I thought. This explains it. One of John Galt’s daughters, who would have been my grandmother’s aunt, married and ended up in New Zealand, and then over a couple of generations married into Maori families.

It seemed like I had finally identified a family path that accounts for at least some part of my present day Maori DNA matches.

But then my whole theory broke down.

In her next email, Amy explained that she and her mother had done the Ancestry DNA test. The test results confirmed that Amy and I are somewhat distantly related, as Ancestry’s ThruLines had predicted.

However, surprisingly, I did not match her mother’s DNA.

So this means that despite the paper trail leading from Amy’s mother back to John Galt, I must be related to Amy through her father’s side of the family. His mother (Amy’s grandmother) was half-Maori, similar to my grandmother, who was half-Hawaiian.

I don’t know if my search for an identifiable link to that Maori line is back to square one, but it sure feels like it.

It underscores for me just how tricky this DNA/genealogy business can be, and how tricky it can get when the paper trail diverges from the DNA record.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Another lesson in genetic genealogy

  1. Lei

    DNA testing accuracy question…Maori’s are supposedly the product of Hawaiian migration and settlement?
    Are the blood test results offering remote possibility of biological relation via common Ali’i lineage in Repetitive breading of ideal ancestral lines over many centuries?
    Every Hawaiian wants to link with Unquestionable rank like Liloa, Ku Ali’i or Royal Birth at Ku’ Kane’ Loko witnessed by #36 Chiefs.

    Reply
  2. Ann R

    Ancestry’s thru lines isn’t gospel. On my tree some of my thru connections dna maybe fine but genealogy data maybe faulty. It pays to do your own research on their tree for accuracy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.