Warrants seek info on a former FBI employee in Miske investigation

The story that cause the delay in Feline Friday appears today at Civil Beat (“The Miske Files: The FBI Is Investigating One Of Its Own“).

This was an unexpected find. I was actually poring through files while working on the initial stages of a different story when I noticed an unfamiliar name in a list of search warrants that were part of the Miske investigation. Each description was only part of a line and contained the case number, and then a description of less than 50 characters. But the entries for these two warrants contained a name, one that hadn’t come up in the Miske case before. So, as usual, I entered a note in the software I use to track story details. Sometime later, I came back around, saw the note, and looked for info background on this person. Nothing much came up until I tried LinkedIn. And it was one of those “Aha!” moments. There on LinkedIn, this person pointed to their experience as an investigative specialist for the FBI. That got my full attention!

They talk about the importance of pattern recognition, and that played a role here. Poring over Miske files, I’ve gotten used to seeing a lot of now-familiar names. Even while just quickly scanning the list, the new name caught my eye. And the seed of what eventually became this story was planted.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Warrants seek info on a former FBI employee in Miske investigation

  1. John Pritchett

    “Only two of the original 70 search warrant files remain sealed in their entirety.

    And those are the two files relating to warrants in the investigation of the former FBI employee.”

    What are they hiding?

    Reply
    1. Ian Lind Post author

      They’ve been quite clear. They are trying to keep from exposing details of an ongoing investigation that could lead to indictments. Tipping off those who aren’t known to be under investigation could expose witnesses to threats and intimidation, and allow key players to destroy evidence. This particular request for continued secrecy was reviewed and approved by Judge Watson, who turned down all the other requests for blanket secrecy. That seems reasonable to me.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.