Category Archives: Court

Miske Trust files an answer to the government’s forfeiture complaint

The trustees of the Michael J. Miske Jr. Revocable Living Trust have filed their answer to the government’s complaint for forfeiture of Miske’s personal and business property.

The government filed its original forfeiture complaint on January 22, and followed with an amended complaint on May 7. The government has identified a long list of properties consisting of cash and checks, real estate, a commercial longline entry permit issued to a fishing vessel Miske previously owned, along with several vintage cars and miscellaneous art work. Estinates of the overall value range from approximately $13 million to as much as $28 million.

The 13-page answer was filed in Honolulu’s Federal District Court on behalf of the trustees by San Francisco attorney Edward M. Burch, a criminal defense attorney who specializes in forfeiture defense.

Burch serves notice that the Trust “demands trial by jury of the issues and defenses raised by its claim and answer.”

The full document is attached below.

Burch generally “denies that the properties are subject to forfeiture…and denies that any violations of the listed statutes occurred with regard to the properties.”

Burch also asserts that he “lacks sufficient information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained therein, and on those grounds, denies each and every allegation contained therein.”

In addition, Burch raises seven affirmative defenses, arguing that forfeiture of some or all of the property “is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and that Miske’s properties “were derived from legitimate
activities and were otherwise unconnected to any violations of law….”

He asserts “some or all of the Defendant properties is not subject to forfeiture because it constitutes that of an innocent owner as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 983(d),” apparently a reference to the status of the trust’s primary beneficiary, Miske’s granddaughter, who is not named in the court filings. She was the daughter of Miske’s late son, Caleb Miske, who died in March 2016.

He then argues the civil forfeiture provisions of federal law “are unconstitutional and unenforceable, in that they constitute a denial of claimant’s due process and equal protection rights under the United States Constitution – the procedures used to adjudicate the seizure of the property should require the government to carry its burden by either beyond a reasonable doubt or by clear and convincing evidence rather than by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Answer to the government's civil forfeiture action by the Miske Revocable Living Trust by Ian Lind

Reposted on Civil Beat

Civil Beat picked up yesterday’s entry and reposted it this morning with a few slight edits (“Judge Rules Miske’s Mother Can’t Represent Granddaughter’s Interests“).

CB also added two photos shared by one of Miske’s cousins on the Miske side of the family. One of the photos displays a large tattoo on Miske’s right arm of his late son, Caleb, who died in 2016. Also included is the judge’s order denying the motion to appoint Miske’s mother, Maydeen Stancil, as guardian to represent his granddaughter, who is the primary beneficiary of the trust.

In any case, you might want to check out the photos and the court’s order.

Claim by Miske’s mother to represent his granddaughter’s interests denied by judge, at least for now

There has been a low-key kerfuffle over a motion filed on behalf of the late Mike Miske’s mother in the government’s civil foreclosure lawsuit that seeks to seize all of the Miske’s property because it was derived from or used to carry out his racketeering activities.

A post here on April 1 noted a claim to Miske’s property, in opposition to the government’s forfeiture demand, had been filed by San Francisco attorney Edward M. Burch on behalf of Miske’s revokable living trust, with a separate claim on behalf of Miske’s granddaughter, who is the sole beneficiary of the trust.

The girl is not named in the court filing because she is a minor, and is only identified by her initials.

And the latter claim was signed by Maydeen Stancil, the mother of Mike Miske and John Stancil, and accompanied by a motion to appoint her as the legal “next friend” or guardian ad litem for Miske’s granddaughter, who is Maydeen Stancil’s biological great-granddaughter. The court can appoint a guardian in litigation involving a minor child in order to protect their interests and act for them, for example to compromise or settle a case.

The court has wide discretion to make such an appointment “in the absence of a duly appointed representative.”

The child’s father, Caleb Miske, Mike Miske’s only son, died in March 2016. The child’s mother, Delia Fabro-Miske, has been sentenced to seven years in federal prison for her role in the Miske affair.

The problem in this motion is that the child’s maternal grandfather had already been granted guardianship by Family Court, which Burch acknowledged in a subsequent court filing. Burch said he had not yet seen the paperwork and had been unable to verify the appointment. Some legal observers said it looked like Burch arrived and tried to bigfoot into the case, but hadn’t done his homework on the guardian issue.

Magistrate Judge Kenneth Mansfield subsequently denied the motion to appoint Maydeen Stancil as guardian, but without prejudice, allowing Burch to refile a motion “that indicates whether [Miske’s granddaughter] has a duly appointed representative….”

In any case, I doubt I am the only one who would question whether Maydeen Stancil would be a suitable guardian for Miske’s granddaughter based on her very public parental track record.

Mike Miske, her oldest son, is dead, after being convicted by a federal jury on 13 counts of racketeering and related charges including murder, kidnapping, and assault, and had been facing a mandatory life sentence.

Her next son, John Stancil, 37, was was a key player in his brother’s criminal organization and was sentenced in February to 20 years in federal prison, the maximum sentence for racketeering conspiracy. During much of that time, he was living at home.

Stancil admitted he had supplied the chemical chloropicrin that was used in chemical attacks on two nightclubs in 2017, and had personally released the same chemical in another nightclub in an earlier attack. Those involved in the 2017 attacks picked up bottles containing the chloropicrin from Stancil at his family’s home in Waimanalo. He also took part in a number of robberies of drug dealers and others, as well as several assaults, including one that ended in the death of a 24-year old associate.

And Maydeen Stancil’s youngest son, Cody, 36, has had several brushes with the law. Most were minor, including several arrests for petty theft from a department store, and a citation for being present in an illegal game room in Waimanalo when it was raided. But he pleaded guilty to 2nd degree robbery, a class B felony, in 2017, and was granted a deferred acceptance of guilty plea. He managed to retain the DAGP despite four arrests during the four-year deferral period, including at least one positive drug test.

In one colorful incident, Cody was arrested at 3:30 a.m. on a Friday morning in June 2018, blocking traffic on Kona Street near Keeaumoku while following a woman and yelling profanities her.

“Stancil was yelling at the top of his lungs causing a ruckus,” the responding officer reported, noting that he appeared to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Stancil followed the woman out to the corner of Kapiolani and Keeaumoku, fronting Ala Moana Shopping Center, where he walked “in the middle of the road blocking traffic again with cars honking their horns, yelling and screaming profanities,” according to a police report on the incident. “Cars were stopping in the middle of the road due to Stancil blocking the roadways from his yelling.” When told he needed to calm down and get out of the road, Stancil responded to the officer: “Fuck you, I do what I like.”

When booked after his arrest, Stancil said he was a plumber’s helper at Miske’s Kamaaina Plumbing and was living in the Stancil family home in Waimanalo. He was charged with disorderly conduct in a Honolulu Weed and Seed criminal complaint, and was bailed out a week later by a man Miske was paying $100 a day to run errands for several of his companies, who also happened to be the brother of one of Miske’s several girlfriends. Attorney Alen Kaneshiro, who appeared in court for a number of Miske associates, negotiated a “no contest” plea in exchange for prosecutors agreement to reduce the offense to a simple violation, apparently in part so that it didn’t affect Cody Stancil’s deferred guilty plea in the robbery case.

Although there is no evidence Maydeen Stancil condoned her son’s criminal activities, there is also no evidence in the record indicating she made any attempt to intervene while they were living at home and using the family house as a home base.

In any case, it just seems to me there are plenty of grounds to question whether she has the judgement to qualify for appointment as a guardian in this case.

“With sound mind….”

“I Michael Miske Jr…With sound mind effectively make the following edits to my trust….”

Less than three months before he died, convicted racketeering boss Michael J. Miske Jr. sat at a computer in Honolulu’s Federal Detention Center to get his affairs in order, and typed out four pages of changes to the trust he had created back in 2008 to hold title to his personal and business assets. His instructions were then printed, notarized by a mobile notary, and mailed to San Francisco-based criminal defense lawyer Christopher J. Cannon, who was representing several Miske companies since 2017.

Copies of these last amendments to the Michael J. Miske Revokeable Living Trust, as amended, along with the the full text of three earlier versions (2008, 2014, and 2016) were filed in federal court by another San Francisco attorney, Edward M. Burch, representing the current trustees of the Miske Trust in opposition to the government’s lawsuit seeking the forfeiture of all of Miske’s property. It is the first time that the provisions of Miske’s trust have been made public.

Miske’s new instructions started off relatively routinely. He confirmed the trust’s primary beneficiary–his granddaughter, the daughter of Miske’s only son, Caleb, who died in March 2016 from complications of injuries received when a vintage 1993 Honda he was driving collided at high speed into a pickup truck turning left across traffic just outside of Windward City Shopping Center.

The girl’s name is redacted in court records, where she is identified only by her initials because she is a minor.

Miske also changed the roster of trustees who he wanted to control the trust after his death. At the time, Miske, then age 50, could look forward to a long natural life, although likely to be lived out in federal custody. But he felt compelled to update his trustee list as if dwelling on his own demise.

The new trustees named by Miske are Honolulu attorney Alen Kaneshiro, who frequently represented Miske, Caleb, and several other Miske associates, including Lance Bermudez, who had Kaneshiro’s telephone number tattood on his arm; Russel Mascoto (“Russel Boy”) who was identified in the trial as a “ghost employee” of Kamaaina Termite who didn’t really work there, but provided “muscle” to Miske; and Jon T. Dahl, owner of companies providing transportation services to the film production industry, a longtime friend and former business partner of Miske.

He also gave instructions regarding his remaining real estate, contingent on regaining control of the assets being held by the government.

“Shall the assets be returned (in full) my wish is to immediately sell 6 Lumahai Honolulu, Hl 96825 for fair market value by a qualified Realtor with experience in marketing and negotiating high-end property,” Miske directed.

In addition, he directed that the mortgate on his second property, a home in Enchanted Lakes, be paid off and the home rented out for fair market value.

In another change of questionable legality, Miske directed his attorney to remove the boilerplate language that empowered the trustees to pay “legally enforceable claims against me or my estate.”

“My trustee does not have my authority to make such payments,” Miske wrote, apparently hoping to increase the time and cost for anyone seeking to collect a debt owed by Miske or his trust.

Then Miske dropped the hammer
Continue reading