UH Hilo student senate tramples open meeting requirements

Two students reporters representing The Student Union, a registered independent student organization at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, were threatened with arrest for attending a public meeting of the campus student government organization last week.

The two reporters were told they could not enter the October 30 public meeting of the UH Hilo Student Association, the student senate, without showing their student identification, and would not be allowed to record the meeting.

Signs were posted which announced both requirements, despite an earlier acknowledgement by UH officials that recording of public meetings must be allowed.

When the reporters persisted, campus security was called. The two did open the unlocked door and enter the meeting, where they were again told they would have to leave.

The incident was described in a press release from The Student Union organization distributed by email this week.

The students also distributed a one-page handout which listed relevant laws and UH policies supporting their right to attend and to record the meeting.

Surprisingly, the list did not include the state’s sunshine law, which provides for open meetings of public agencies.

I originally noted here that the sunshine law applies to the student government. That was my recollection from a controversy during the 1970s over the Manoa student senate’s control over a share of the proceeds from sale of the old Honolulu Stadium in Moiliili. However, I’ve learned that a 1985 legal opinion by the attorney general, issued prior to the creation of the Office of Information Practices, ruled the opposite.

I have not yet obtained a copy of that opinion to review.

The sunshine law requires public meetings to be open to the public and, if applicable to UH, would not appear to allow attendance to be restricted only to UH students, faculty, and administrators. And a requirement to produce identification as a condition of entering a public meeting would also appear to be contrary to the sunshine law’s open meeting requirements.

In addition, the law specifically allows audio recordings of public meetings, although it is silent on video recording. However, the law was passed before small devices, like smartphones, which can record both audio and video became widely available. And the law is specifically required to be interpreted broadly in favor of open meetings. For this reason, it seems likely that non disruptive video recording using small handheld devices would found to be consistent with the intent of the law.

Video taken while they were in the meeting showed that the it was already being taped, apparently as part of the official record.

Previous opinions of the Office of Information Practices have held that audio recordings maintained by government agencies are public records. To the extent that those recordings are held by university employees, it would seem that they would be considered public records, whether or not the open meeting requirements apply.

Here’s a summary of OIP’s Opinion 92-13:

The State Office of Veterans Services (OVS) must disclose the audio tape recording of a public meeting held by the State Commission on Memorials for Veterans of the Korean and Vietnam Conflicts (Commission). The OIP determined that the audio tape recording of the Commission’s public meeting is a “government record” under the UIPA and that none of the exceptions to required disclosure applies to this government record. Also, section 92F-12(a)(16), Hawaii Revised Statutes, expressly requires an agency to make available for public inspection and copying “[i]nformation contained in or compiled from a transcript . . . of a proceeding open to the public.” Therefore, upon receiving a request for the disclosure of the audio tape recording of the Commission’s meeting, the OVS cannot fulfill its obligations by merely disclosing the written meeting minutes.

And Opinion 97-06:

The Department of Health’s (“DOH”) audio cassette recordings of its public meetings are government records that are public under the UIPA. The DOH must provide another audio cassette copy rather than a written transcript of the recordings upon receiving a request for a cassette copy.

In breaking news, The Student Union’s Facebook page reported today that the Student Association’s advisor has “stepped down” and that “all future UHHSA meetings cancelled until new adviser found.”

It seems this is a story with legs.

Stay tuned!


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “UH Hilo student senate tramples open meeting requirements

  1. Juicy_J

    More great work by Ellen Kusano!

    “Campus Center Director Ellen Kusano was the only UH Official in the 10/30/15 meeting.
    She was also present when Dean Oaks informed UHHSA that nothing could be done to
    prevent recording of public meetings. Kusano is one of the defendants named on a
    lawsuit the University of Hawaii recently settled regarding free speech on campus. As a
    result of this lawsuit naming Kusano the university was forced to pay $50K”

    Reply
  2. Ken Conklin

    UH Hilo seems to be a hotbed of suppression of freedom of expression and open-meeting rules.

    Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, and also
    FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) have chronologies of events and legal documents in the case at UH Hilo last year, where university officials tried to refuse a student group the right to hand out copies of the U.S. Constitution on campus and tried to force the students to exercise their first-amendment rights only in the campus “free speech zone.”
    See
    http://new.grassrootinstitute.org/2014/04/lawsuit-filed-over-uh-hilos-breach-of-students-first-amendment-rights/
    and
    https://www.thefire.org/cases/university-of-hawaii-at-hilo-speech-code-litigation/
    The students won their lawsuit, and UH had to pay $50,000 in legal costs.
    In January the Grassroot Institute held a special event to honor the two UH-Hilo students who led the successful protest against university violation of free-speech rights. The students were given the 2015 Unsung Hero award.
    https://www.facebook.com/events/891302367578384/

    Reply
  3. Allen N.

    This story brings to mind the student council turmoil at HCC-Hilo, when a couple of officers claimed they were removed because they dared to question the administration about how thousands of dollars in student fees were being spent.

    http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/25229420/hilo-community-college-collected-245k-in-fees-for-non-existent-facilities-and-services

    Seems like quite of bit of dysfunction when it comes to student governance on both Hilo campuses.

    Reply
  4. JustinAvery

    This would not happen at UH Manoa.
    This would not happen on the mainland.
    We are a thousand miles from nowhere.
    The Constitution and Bill of Rights still apply.
    Mahalo for covering this story.
    Justin Avery
    UH Hilo Alum

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.