Monthly Archives: September 2011

Media Symposium at UH Hilo to feature bloggers, journalists

If you happen to be on the Big Island, you may have already heard about the UH Hilo Media Syposium scheduled for Saturday, October 1.

The day-long event, was organized by journalist Tiffany Edwards Hunt, advisor to the University of Hawaii-Hilo student newspaper, Ke Kalahea, among other hats she wears.

I’ll defer to the write-up describing the event in her Big Island Chronicles, a blog of Hawaii Island news and commentary.

It’s a pretty ambitious undertaking, “a gathering of statewide journalists and bloggers with Sunshine Law champion senator Les Ihara and Office of Information Practices Director Cheryl Kakazu Park.”

Symposium attendees will explore journalism fundamentals, receive refreshers on the Sunshine Law, libel and citizens rights and responsibilities, at the same time that they discuss how new media has changed the professions of newspapering, radio, and television and explore press credentials in the age of new media. State legislators’ exemption of themselves from the Sunshine Law and social media for members of County Councils and other community boards and commissions will also be discussed. Intro to blogging, an AP Style Quiz, an iPad workshop, a review of the Hawaii Police Department’s General Orders on media credentials, and a press conference on legislative and other issues pertaining to the Sunshine Law can be expected.

I’ll be there among the lineup of island journalists, bloggers, and others.

Star-Advertiser sunshine lawsuit blocked behind its own paywall

The Star-Advertiser reports today that a circuit court judge is “leaning towards” ordering the city to pay the newspapers legal costs in a lawsuit seeking public disclosure of the tapes of 911 calls during a June 3 shooting incident that left one person dead and two wounded.

In response to the suit, the city has reportedly agreed to release several tapes, but is still trying to block release of others.

The S-A reports:

City Deputy Corporation Counsel Edwin Nomura said that upon review of the case, the city agreed to release five tapes.

Wait. You mean they didn’t bother to review the law before rejecting requests for disclosure? No, what I think they really mean is that they decided to stonewall as long as they could get away with it.

In any case, the Star-Advertiser should get credit for pursuing disclosure in court. Holding agencies accountable, and forcing them to pay the legal costs, appears to be a necessary part of getting them to pay attention to the law. But the S-A sadly continues to lock the story of its success in this regard behind a pretty solid paywall that prevents spreading the word. If not for that sturdy paywall, I would have included a link to the story about the case. Instead, I’ll have to wait until Civil Beat covers the case. At least their paywall is semi-permeable, with some information freely accessible.

The rigid paywall strategy is one approach to monetizing the newspaper’s product, but it seems to conflict with the equally valid need to market and sell the news. Somehow “new media” consumers need to become newspaper consumers, and the paywall, at least the rigid version of it, appears to make that unlikely.

I should mention that I have been reading the S-A’s e-edition on my iPad every morning. This is the version that is a digital replica of the print edition, and allows the reader to easily focus on individual articles while moving through the pages and sections. I find it a fuller experience than the online edition, perhaps because the S-A doesn’t routinely utilize the full potential of online news to provide more of the story.

The e-edition can be read using the S-A’s own iPad or iPhone app by PressReader, which offers its own app with a list of nearly 2,000 global newspapers, all accessible for a flat $29.95 per month fee. There are limits. Only five newspapers can be set for automatic download, and only two weeks of back issues can be saved on your own computer. But it looks like a real deal for news junkies!

Making more info publicly available could help Abercrombie administration

The Abercrombie administration could improve its situation by making more information available to the public.

Take the emergency proclaimation that suspends various laws in order to facilitate the removal of unexploded military ordnance from land controlled by the state and counties. It has provided only the slimmest public rationale for the range of laws being suspended, everything from historic preservation and conservation laws to Chapter 46 regarding county organization and administration.

Searching around online yesterday, I found a set minutes of the Former Waikoloa Maneuver Area Restoration Advisory Board meeting, dated October 1, 2008 which discuss the Corps of Engineers’ problems getting access to state lands around the Hapuna Beach area.

The State believes the Corps has to go through the NEPA process (i.e., prepare either an EA or EIS) for any detonation done on State land. It is the Corps’ position that under FUDS, the Corps is covered by CERCLA which puts public safety ahead of environmental issues.

I had to look up the references. FUDS refers to the Formerly Used Defense Sites program, while CERCLA is the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund).

According to the minutes, Rep. Cindy Evans agreed to seek the assistance of then-Attorney General Mark Bennett in resolving the right of entry issue.

The Corps was still waiting for a response from the AG’s office in March 2009, another set of minutes shows.

The point is that there must be quite a paper trail for this issue, one that perhaps could help the public understand why such a sweeping executive order was seen as necessary.

The work of surveying the public lands for possible unexploded weapons and then taking necessary action is being done under a series of multi-million dollar contracts from the Army Corps of Engineers.

More on that when I find a little more time.