Details lost in reporting election-by-mail results

I guess I was surprised by the results in the special election for the Honolulu City Council District 4 seat, which finally wrapped up last night.

The results were posted just before 9 p.m.

They were quite sparse. They tell us who won, but not much else. Lots of data that is normally available is missing, and these are data that both journalists and campaign strategists rely on.

Click to see a larger version.

In a regular election, precinct-level data are available. This means that data for each polling place are reported.

Looking at the 2018 General Election results, for example, we know that a total of 1053 ballots were cast at Kahala Elementary School for either Tommy Waters or Trevor Ozawa, with 80 additional ballots were blank. In addition, the data show that 165 people registered to vote at Kahala School (District 19, Precinct 2) voted early and are reported as absentee walk-in votes. And, finally, the data show that 1,890 people mailed in their absentee ballots.

By comparing the results for precincts in different parts of a candidate’s district, it’s relatively simple to see where they were strongest, where they were trounced, and where they were competitive. That kind of information is essential for evaluating the campaign’s efforts and targeting campaign resources in future elections.

What isn’t clear at this point is whether similar data are available but not included in the campaign results posted by city election officials last night, or whether this information is simply lost. There’s nothing on the city’s Elections Division website to indicate that additional data will be forthcoming.

And, further, what data will be reported in future all-mail elections? Is there any technical reasons why these results were stripped of all precinct-level data? Does anybody else see this as a problem?


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “Details lost in reporting election-by-mail results

  1. Lei

    Clearly City Clerk Glen Takahasi and his Elections Director (HGEA member) were caught naked, pants down, violating the State law and were completely compromised in what may be a Federal Election indictment for conspiracy. One could reasonable assume The Department of Justice is in review of our General Election crime.
    They may join the rest of City officials on trial soon. The Supreme Court was a Hail Mary savior between crime spree and justice, affirmed!
    Clerk Glen Takahasi and staff should have real possible co-conspirator nightmare scenario’s to worry about real prison time.
    And Trump DOJ loves preps in bluest of blue States.

    Reply
  2. Greg Knudsen

    I, too, went looking for the detailed results and saw they were not posted on the city clerks election site. I’m still hoping that they will appear after some verification time. They should have the precinct-by-precinct information, and it should be released to the public.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.