New light on an old tale

Here’s a little voyage into family history you might find of interest, prompted by a recent column by Peter Apo in Civil Beat about the Battle of Kuamo‘o (“Peter Apo: How A Violent Battle In 1819 Still Impacts Hawaii Today”).

Apo had previously observed that he only learned of the Battle of Kuamo‘o a few years ago, and believes most Hawaiians don’t know about it.

I think that’s true, and I know it was true in our family.

Follow me back in time. In the early 1950s, my mother started gathering information about her Hawaiian genealogy. One of best sources was George Kopa, a “cousin” who lived in Kahala just a couple of blocks from our house.

Consistent with his Mormon faith, Kopa had gathered many records. And, consistent with his Hawaiian culture, there were unwritten stories that he also shared. My mom wrote out her annotated summary of Kopa’s information in 1994, when she was 80.

Like many modern Hawaiians, my mother apparently did not know of the Battle of Kuamo‘o, and believed a battle that is part of our family narrative must have been prior to 1800, and that led her to discount Kopa’s account of a battle that brought his ancestors (and ours) to Maui.

This part of my genealogy is based on information given me in the early 1950s by George Clement K. Kopa, who lived for many years on the makai side of Kahala Ave near the corner of Pueo. He was then about 80 and as a devout Mormon, had gathered this information years before and recorded it on a large chart from which I copied what I felt I needed. [My mother’s guess of his age was several years off, as Kopa died in 1963 at age 83.]

His earliest known male ancestor was Kapu, whose son Kahimanapookalani was the grandfather of Mr. Kopa. Apparently Kahimanapookalani was also know as Kopa which became the surname of his sons. We know our ancestor Kina was the daughter of Kahooilimoku who, according to Mr. Kopa, was the brother of Kahimanapookalani. [Note: That would have made Mr. Kopa and my grandmother second cousins, as their grandparents–Kahooilimoku and Kahimanapookalani–were brothers.]

Mr. Kopa also related a number of family traditions which he had not put into writing. It seems to me that some of the traditions don’t fit into recorded history, probably because there seems to be some confusion as to the generation in which particular incidents occurred. For instance, the name Kahooilimoku is said to commemorate a shipwreck. There were four (?) brothers who were warriors serving a high chief on the island of Hawaii, probably Kau. Their army was defeated in battle and their chief was killed. The brothers rescued the chief’s body and escaped from the scene in a canoe. A storm arose and the canoe was blown off course, and wrecked on the coast of Kaupo, Maui. The brothers lay exhausted and injured on the beach where they were found by several young women who took them home and cared for them. The men married their rescuers and remained in Kaupo. The name Kahooilimoku is supposed to commemorate this flight and shipwreck. Mr Kopa implied that this tradition concerns the four sons of Kapu. But the sons on his chart were born probably circa 1820-1840, long after the islands were united and wars between chiefs of the districts of Hawaii had ended. It is my guess that the traditional battle took place no later than 1800. It seems more logical that Kapu was the son of the of the warrior brothers who ended up in Kaupo.

I was very new at genealogy in the 1950s and did not question what I was being told for it seemed impolite. As I review my old notes, I see that I must have been confused and considered the four sons of Kapu as the shipwrecked warriors. Perhaps only one or two brothers were shipwrecked and Kapu was the son of one of them. I leave this for someone else to explore.

My mom’s attempt to reconcile this bit of family lore with the more established dates from her genealogical research might have come to a different conclusion had she known about the bloody battle in North Kona that took place in 1819. It appears to be time to take another close look at this family tale, but I don’t know if I’m up to it.

An aside: Here’s a story that appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser on August 31, 1939, on George Kopa’s retirement. Just click on the story to read a larger version.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “New light on an old tale

  1. Veronica Ohara

    Brilliant, thank you for sharing such a personal story. Yesterday’s words about Ms. Trask brought back memories of UHM and the heroic George Helm.

    Reply
  2. Kenneth Shock

    It’s not the fault of Christianity that the Alii retained vast amounts of land for their own families, in the Great Mehele – giving commoners a pittance

    Reply
  3. Ann R

    Thanks for the personal historical perspective of Hawaiian lore. No doubt these blog posts will be reference points for historians and genealogists in the future.

    Reply
  4. Stan F.

    As with many born and raised in Hawaii, having taken Hawaiian history at both the high school and college level, I too was unaware of the Battle of Kuamo‘o until just a few short years ago. In analyzing the lead up to the battle and the battle itself (I studied this during the TMT blockade of 2019) I came to feel that the teaching of the battle and the issues behind it brought up sticky contradictions to the current narrative of the Hawaiian Sovereignty movement. One of the realizations I had after analyzing the event vis a vie the current zeitgeist is that anyone saying that the Hawaiian people were 100% victims of outside forces destroying their system is not exactly true. Native Hawaiians decided to address the issue of outlawing the Kapu system first by negotiation in Kona, and then solving it with foreign arms (on both sides mind you) at the fields of Kuamo‘o.

    The site is still there and is a historical area which one can visit (but as of a couple of months ago, because of COVID, it was closed), but the issue of this battle is something that, in my opinion, should be one that is part of the overall matrix of the current Sovereignty movement. Facts of what and who matter in this as it was a pivotal moment that defined modern Hawaii.

    Reply
    1. Brad Sellers

      I don’t think anyone has ever claimed Hawaiians are just passive victims. Ut the original narrative was that whatever had happened to them (overthrow, Christianity, cultural suppression) was good for them. once that myth was discarded, the question is do other groups bare any responsibility for those things? And I think the answer is yes, many do.

      Reply
  5. Michele L

    Mahalo for sharing this! I am a descendant of the Kopa Ohana, and to read this is such a delight. I recall my father speaking about this particular battle, but it wasn’t the only one he shared. I have been dabbling into my genealogy off and on for a few years, and its nice to find “new light.” Mahalo again!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Michele L Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.