A Maui woman convicted nine year ago of scamming about 200 people with a Hawaiian sovereignty-based mortgage debt relief scheme, is back in Honolulu’s Federal Detention Center awaiting a hearing on a government motion to revoke her supervised release.
It’s a reminder that there is a history of scams and frauds that have utilized popular theories of Hawaiian sovereignty to convince victims to part with their money.
Mahealani Ventura, formerly known as Mahealani Ventura-Oliver, was convicted after an 11-day jury trial in 2013 on 15 counts of mail fraud, one count each of money laundering, conspiring to submit false tax returns which sought $1.5 million in refunds, submitting a false tax return, and conspiring to use fictitious financial instruments. The jury found a co-defendant, Pilialoha Teves, guilty of conspiring to use fictitious financial instruments and 12 counts of mail fraud. Two others, including Ventura’s then-estranged husband, John D. Oliver, pleaded guilty and cooperated with prosecutors. A fifth defendant was determined not to be competent to stand trial.
I described details about the scam in a post written while Ventura’s trial was underway (“On scams and the sovereignty narrative“).
Ventura received the longest sentence, 78 months incarceration, and was released from federal custody on July 19, 2019, records show. She then began three years of supervised release, and had been scheduled to end the period of supervision in July 2022.
While on supervised release, Ventura was required to comply with several restrictions, including filing monthly reports, notifying her probation officer 10 days prior to a change in employment, paying all expenses out of a single bank account, and obtaining prior approval before opening new bank accounts or obtaining credit cards or merchant charge accounts.
A “Statement of Alleged Violations of Supervised Release” requested that Ventura be required to appear in court “to show cause why supervision should not be revoked.” It was filed in Honolulu’s Federal District Court on February 1, 2022, and listed eight specific violations, which started in September 2021, when she was two-thirds of the way through the period of supervision.
Based on the record, the federal probation office concluded:
Ms. Ventura-Oliver’s behavior and actions clearly reflect a breach of the Court’s trust as evident by her repeated and continuous violations. Ms. Ventura-Oliver’s pattern of non-compliance reflects a disregard for the Court’s order. Consequently, it is respectfully recommended that the Court issue a Summons for Ms. Ventura-Oliver’s appearance before the Court to show cause why supervised release should not be revoked.
Court records show Ventura admitted to the original eight violations. A subsequent additional violation, Number 9, is still before the court, and appears to have triggered the issuance of a warrant for her arrest. Ventura was arrested on Maui on April 12, and is currently being held in Honolulu’s Federal Detention Center.
A revocation hearing is scheduled on Monday afternoon, April 25, before Chief District Judge J. Michael Seabright. Ventura’s court appointed attorney was allowed to withdraw from the case earlier this month, and she will be represented at next week’s hearing by a newly appointed attorney.
Ventura’s violations appear to be Grade C technical violations that do not constitute violations of federal, state, or local laws.
According to a study by the US Sentencing Commission, a judge has several options if it is determined a defendant has violated the conditions of release, including sending the defendant back for an additional term in prison, extending the period of supervised release, or amending the conditions of release. Given the seriousness of her offenses, it appears possible she could be sentenced to another 6-12 months incarceration.
See:
Indictment, USA vs. Mahealani Ventura-Oliver et al, May 26, 2011.
“Tuesday…More on that mortgage scam,” iLind.net, Nov 18, 2008.
“Tuesday, continued…More on the latest sovereignty scam,” iLind.net, Nov 18, 2008.
“Monday…Court documents yield more details in Maui scam case,” iLind.net, June 1, 2009.
“Hawaiiloa Foundation/Ko Hawaii Pae Aina indictments to test sovereignty claims,” iLind.net, May 27, 2011.
“Judge rejects “nonsensical” documents filed in Maui sovereignty scam case,” iLind.net, July 12, 2011.
“Two sovereignty activists plead guilty to fraud and conspiracy in Maui bond scam,” iLind.net, Sept 27, 2012.
“Federal trial underway in Hawaiian sovereignty mortgage assistance fraud case,” ilind.net, Oct 10, 2013.
“On scams and the sovereignty narrative,” iLind.net, Oct 11, 2013.
“Maui Resident Sentenced for Fraud and Tax Charges Related to Debt Elimination Scheme,” US Attorney’s Office, Honolulu, Dec 3, 2014.
Discover more from i L i n d
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Reminds me of token women off to jail, while more egregious fraud/theft by others in same business never get behind bars.
First Title heads had little or no jail time, though none of them, including this woman should get jail time. This is common and cruel message-sending by land powerbrokers, a rampant tactic in today’s cancel culture and censorship.