There’s a lot of weirdness loose in the world these days

I just wanted to share this example to show that Hawaiians in pseudo-sovereignty groups aren’t the only ones grabbing onto stuff found online which they believe proves certain rights or can serve as a shield against financial problems such as foreclosure.

This is a legal advertisement that has run twice in the Hawaii Tribune-Herald, and is due to be published a final time on the 4th of July.

Put on your seatbelt, please, to prepare yourself.

The person named, Yanah Marie Brennan, claims to be “grantor, beneficiary, heir administrator” of the “Yanah Marie Brennan Estate,” which supposedly holds a a “perfected interest” or “a priority secured interest in the Debtor’s property by private agreement in the amount of thirty-three billion dollars ($33,000,000,000.00).”

Billion, with a B.

Did I mention that the Estate is described as “a commercial transmitting utility for transmitting life energy into a valuable form cognizable in commerce.” Someone at least has a sense of humor, or so it would appear.

The legal notice advises that anyone with a claim against the Yanah Marie Brennan Estate must be submitted to a Vancouver, Washington address within 30-days of the final publication date will be “null and void by operation of law.”

I did a very quick check, and found that Brennan and her husband, Lars Brennan, are facing a lawsuit by HSBC Bank seeking to foreclose on a home in the Lilipuna Estates Condominium which they purchased in 2004. The 2,432 square foot 4-bedroom, 3-bath home was purchased for $319,000 with a $287,100 mortgage loan, real estate records show.

Two years later, the couple appears to have refinanced with a new $725,000.00 mortgage with interest of 6.5%. Just two years later, they filed for bankruptcy.

The home on Lilipuna Road is valued for real property tax purposes at $973,300, city records show, but the couple couple’s mortgage is in default, and they owed $1,205,629.47 as of December 31, 2021, with additional interest accruing at $127.90 per day, “along with other additional fees, costs, and advances and legal fees and costs.”

The Brennans now live in Vancouver, Washington.

Another quick online search turned up several other examples of people filing virtually the exact same legal notice, including one in Winston Salem, NC, and another in Brentwood, Tennessee, and another in Ventura, California, all dated during 2022, and eachh claiming one of those private trust agreements valued at $33 Billion.

I guess people in desperate financial condition do desperate things, but this kind of legalistic mumbo jumbo is likely to just dig them deeper into the financial hole.

It should be possible to figure out where this stuff is being copied from, and whether that source is free, or if these people have paid for such advice.

I haven’t managed to figure that out, but other’s may have better luck.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “There’s a lot of weirdness loose in the world these days

  1. Citizen Moor

    Showtime TV Series called Vice, featured a segment last week in Sovereignty. No not the Hawaiian version, it was based on the East Coast. It’s vaguely aligned with a group called the “Moors” of Moroccan descent. The “Moors” have a fraternal order and wear a Red Fez Hat.
    Somewhat similar to Hawaii’s Royal Order Masonic organizations.
    The “Moors” are in disagreement with Caucasian Sovereignty Claimants, who they state they have no rights or entitlements to there claims. Well, couldn’t believe what I was seeing, another PARALLEL SOVEREIGN KINGDOM of White Americans, now claiming Moroccan amazing claims.
    In this case the “Moor’achans” are as legitimate as the Masonic Royal Hawaiian Orders. Not!

    Reply
  2. Lei

    Lars Brennan, grew up in Laikua in Maunawili Estates. He is the son of Rev. Paul Brennan, PhD anthropology (Amish) who worked for Royal Hawaiian C.C. In Maunawili / BPM.
    He is also President of the Kailua Historical Society.

    Reply
  3. John Swindle

    I didn’t understand at first who the debtor was supposed to be. Was she claiming some actual property? No. She’s just applying for the imaginary sum the DOH has on file with her birth certificate. The logic starts to cohere and is an embarrassment to logic.

    Reply
  4. Lei

    All these years I’ve been blaming my fellow natives. Only to find out, they are not alone nor original “Sovereigns”. Just copiers infected with Western influence, who poorly and falsely copied the “Moors” of African decent.

    The unlawful overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom Government is fact. As noted in President Clinton’s Apology letter. But, No separate issue of personal sovereignty right is enjoyed by individual or small groupings of the “Native Tenants”.

    Reply
    1. Professor Obvious

      It’s now July 4. Let’s all celebrate the illegal Declaration of Independence and illegal American Revolution.

      Never heard them described like that?

      Well, they were obviously illegal in the eyes of the ancien régime they opposed — the British Empire and its monarchy.

      All other coups, insurgences, revolutions, and wars of conquest are similarly “illegal” to the populations and structures they oppose, but are rarely described as such no matter how worthy or heinous they are viewed in retrospect.

      We don’t refer to “Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine” as it continues to wreak untold havoc, or even “the illegal Holocaust,” that great crime against humanity, as most of us are smart enough that such redundancy is unnecessary. And certainly not “Kamehameha’s illegal conquest,” with all its genocidal tendencies that are not mentioned in polite company, though armies of ghosts at Iao Valley and the Pali might beg to differ.

      So why do some folks insist on casually or imperiously referring to the overthrow of Hawaii’s monarchy in 1893 as “the illegal overthrow?”

      To telegraph their value judgement of the outcome, their sympathy to continuing assertions of sovereignty, and their presumed moral superiority and pandering wokeness?

      It really just sounds gratuitous and silly, like a foghorn at a stoplight.

      It’s downright cringe-inducing when newscast talking heads occasionally do it, and it’s hard to tell if they’re consciously engaging in a propaganda campaign, taking what they judge to be the safest path through a minefield of delicate sensibilities, or are just mindlessly parroting what they assume to be standard and conventional terminology.

      It’s superfluous, amateurish, and condescending to the audience, no matter how angry, wistful, or guilt-ridden anyone is about the monarchy or its end, or the continuing fallout.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.