Category Archives: Consumer issues

Not too happy about our Hawaiian/Alaska experience on this trip

Just a little therapeutic venting.

We splurged for first class seats to Seattle and back on the airline slowly coming together as a result of the merger of Alaska and Hawaiian.

A red flag came up early when I was booking the reservations. I called Hawaiian, booked the flights, then asked about seats. Well, the flight back on Hawaiian wasn’t a problem. But the flight over to Seattle on Alaska was a problem. I could book a reservation but could not get seats assigned through Hawaiian. Suddenly they were two separate airlines. No workaround. Luckily, when I made the call to Alaska reservations, we were happy with the seats available. But I can easily imagine things going sideways at this point.

Early on the morning of our departure for the Great Northwest, our cab driver asked what airline.

I said Hawaiian, since that was where I booked the flights.

Luckily, she pushed back. Alaska and Hawaiian are currently in different terminals. I hurriedly checked my emails, and both the Hawaiian and Alaska apps.

Turns out we were leaving from the Alaska gates in Terminal 2 at HNL, not the familiar Hawaiian lobby over in Terminal 1.

First problem dodged, except that the Hawaiian lounge is over in Terminal 1, meaning that it wasn’t really available to us.

Check-in and bag drop wasn’t a problem, and we proceeded on the long walk to the only open TSA PreCheck screening area. Here we got another surprise.

Although we’ve made lots of Hawaiian flights over the years and have always been properly put in the PreCheck category, apparently that info wasn’t shared with Alaska, and no one along the way suggested that we check. So we were turned away by a friendly but firm TSA agent who said the airline had us in the system as regular passengers, no PreCheck, and there was nothing he could do about it. “You have to go back to the airline,” he said.

This problem grated, since it involved lots of extra early morning walking between gates and the loss of PreCheck benefits, and a lack of disclosure by the two airlines that we assumed were now one.

When we finally cleared the regular security check, my first task was to dig through the Alaska and Hawaiian websites and make sure our “Known Traveler” numbers, which are key to getting cleared for the appropriate security screening process, were entered. Hawaiian had them. Alaska didn’t, and there was no sharing between the two sides of the merged airline.

The Alaska Airlines flight to Seattle was, well, okay. But it came nowhere near the friendly and attentive service we had become used to on Hawaiian, whether in economy or first class. A meal was served, and it was as good as can be expected. But that was just about the end of the service offered during the 5-1/2 hour flight.

Before our flight to Seattle, we were asked to pre-select a meal option, which we did.

We’re now 48-hours from our flight back to Honolulu, and I checked the Hawaiian website for info on a similar meal selection for the flight.

Finding nothing, I initiated a chat with what turned out to be an AI assistant rather than a person. It repeated directions applicable to economy passengers, which meant no preselection of meals.

“… you are welcome to bring your own meals or snacks on board, but please note that there is no option to choose your meal in advance.”

I replied by noting that our flight over in first class had indeed offered a choice, forgetting once again that these are still primarily two separate airlines, although that separation will supposedly end soon.

Honestly, I have my doubts.

We chose to fly Hawaiian/Alaska based on our previous experience with Hawaiian, and the availability of a direct flight to Seattle, in contract to United which requires a stopover and plane change in San Francisco.

But this experience certainly takes the rose off of the Alaska/Hawaiian option, and may send us back into United land.

A little time out from obsessing about all the bad news

This post has nothing to do with the state of the world, which as we know is abysmal. It’s just a little oddity looking for an explanation.

This beautiful koa side table was auctioned off recently in Honolulu.

The question is simple. There were moveable side panels on both ends that would swing out to the side. Meda’s demonstrating with one of then. Although the swung out to create a flat surface, there didn’t appear to be a way to hold them up in place.

So what are the swinging side panels for? They must have had a function.

All of us at the auction preview were stumped.

If you know or just want to guess, please leave a comment!

Is Honolulu really the least pet-friendly city in the country?

Hawaii ranks dead last among the country’s 100 largest cities ranked according to how pet friendly they are, according to a study by the online finance site, WalletHub.

Although Honolulu ranked #12 for outdoor pet friendliness, it was dragged down to the bottom of the list on other factors.

The top-ranked pet-friendly cities, with their overall scores, were spread across the country.

1 Scottsdale, AZ 66.19
2 Tampa, FL 61.04
3 Cincinnati, OH 59.97
4 Las Vegas, NV 59.16
5 Portland, OR 58.98

And at the bottom of the list, by overall rank:

96 Fresno, CA 43.36
97 Milwaukee, WI 42.69
98 Stockton, CA 39.24
99 Boston, MA 39.17
100 Honolulu, HI 37.33

The ranking was based on more than 20 metrics which are skewed towards dogs, according to a description of the study’s methodology.

That limitation aside, the study made imaginative use of existing data.

Pet Budget – Total Points: 25

Veterinary Care Costs: Full Weight (~10.00 Points)
Minimum Pet-Care Provider Rate per Visit: Half Weight (~5.00 Points)
Dog Insurance Premium: Full Weight (~10.00 Points)

Pet Health & Wellness – Total Points: 50

Veterinarians per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Pet Caretakers per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Animal Trainers per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Pet Businesses per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Dog-Friendly Restaurants per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Dog-Friendly Shops per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Pet Meetup Groups per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Doggie Daycare & Boarding Establishments per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Pet-Friendliness of Rental Market: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Note: This metric measures the share of pet-friendly rental units.
Average Home Square Footage: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Share of Single-Family Detached Homes: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Share of Homes with One or Fewer Occupants per Room: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Animal Shelters per Capita**: Full Weight (~3.57 Points)
Strength of Animal Protection Laws: Full* Weight (~3.57 Points)
Note: This metric is based on the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s “Best & Worst States for Animal Protection Laws” ranking.

Outdoor Pet-Friendliness – Total Points: 25

Weather: Full Weight (~4.55 Points)
Note: This metric is based on WalletHub’s “Cities with the Best & Worst Weather” ranking.
Dog Parks per Capita**: Full Weight (~4.55 Points)
Parkland as Share of City Area: Full Weight (~4.55 Points)
Walk Score: Full Weight (~4.55 Points)
Dog-Friendly Trails per Capita**: Full Weight (~4.55 Points)
Dog Shows per Capita**: Half* Weight (~2.27 Points)

Hey, pet lovers….Reactions?

Attorney facing criminal charges is sued by a former associate

Robert Chapman, the former managing partner of a major Honolulu law firm who was indicted in June on charges stemming from a fraudulent probate case, has now been sued by a former associate attorney who says he defrauded and defamed her while carrying out the probate fraud.

The complaint filed on behalf of Allison Yee, an associate attorney of the law firm then known as Clay Chapman Iwamura Pulice & Nervell, where where Chapman was her boss and supervising attorney until he resigned from the practice of law in lieu of discipline at the end of 2022.

Yee’s lawsuit alleges Chapman came to her in October 2018 and requested that she sign an application for informal probate of the will of Robert James Boulette, a 77-year-old Honolulu man who had died two years earlier. Chapman, her boss, made the request although Yee did not usually work on probate cases.

Yee asked to see the case file, which included the draft application Chapman had prepared, as well as what appeared to be Boulette’s will and a single supplement, or codicil. After checking the information in the application against the will itself, Yee signed the application, which was filed in court on October 24, 2018, initiating the probate of Boulette’s estate. The application designated Chapman to be appointed as Boulette’s personal representative.

The application was rejected by the court in December 2018 due to “irregularities” found in the will. However, Yee says she was not informed of the denial.

Although the application had been denied by the court, Chapman then took Yee’s name and Hawaii State Bar Association credentials, without her knowledge, and used them to create fraudulent Letters of Administration that allowed him to take control of property belonging to Boulette’s estate, including a Nuuanu condominium, and convert the property and cash to his own use.

The complaint claims Yee did not know about Chapman’s “fraudulent conduct,” including the forged changes to the will, or Chapman’s creation and use of fraudulent letters of administration, until she was interviewed by an investigator from the Attorney General’s office in November 2023.

The lawsuit alleges Yee was damaged in several ways, and seeks “general, special, and punitive damages against Defendants in an amount to be proven at trial.”

Chapman committed civil fraud when he made “false representations” to obtain Yee’s signature on the probate application when he “knew that some of the material information contained therein was false.”

Further, the complaint charges “Chapman defamed or put Plaintiff in a false light
when he caused her to sign The Application, which was prepared by him; and The Application was based upon The Alleged Will, which Defendant Chapman knew to be fraudulent and manipulated.”

Finally, as a result of Chapman’s “intentional, reckless and outrageous” behavior, Yee has suffered extreme emotional distress.

In a declaration filed in court this week, attorneys Jim Bickerton and Tyler Mincavage said they expect the probable jury award “would likely be in excess of $150,000.00.”

Meanwhile, Chapman’s criminal trial, originally set to begin later this month, has been postponed until later this year to allow ongoing plea negotiations to continue.

Court minutes show prosecutors affirmed that a plea offer had been sent and that plea negotiations “are still ongoing.”

Chapman surrendered his law license at the end of 2022 after an investigation of a different case by the Attorney General found he “wrongfully attempted to lay claim to approximately $2,000,000.00 in abandoned property” by falsely claiming to represent the owner, who had been a former client years previously.

Chapman’s name was quickly dropped by his former law firm, which is now known as Clay Iwamura Pulice & Nervell.

Also see:

Fraud allegations lead to resignation of prominent business attorney, iLind.net, December 29, 2022

Two cases of legal fraud linked to prominent firm, iLind.net, April 28, 2023

Former Honolulu attorney indicted in alleged $750K probate fraud, iLind.net, June 21, 2025