Tag Archives: Stephens Media Group

Two wrongly-fired reporters still awaiting NLRB-ordered back pay

Stephens Media, the union-busting owner of the Hawaii Tribune-Herald, is back at it again. In the latest chapter of a long running saga of labor law violations, the Tribune-Herald is stalling payments to two journalists previously ordered by the National Labor Relations Board, according to a release from the Pacific Media Workers Guild, which now includes Newspaper Guild members in Hawaii.

Hawaii paper seeks to stiff wronged reporters

By Carl Hall

April 26, 2013

HONOLULU — More than seven years after illegally firing two reporters for union activity, management of the Hawaii Tribune-Herald is seeking to reduce the amount of back pay it owes the wronged journalists.

Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey D.Wedekind conducted a two-day compliance hearing at the Honolulu offices of the National Labor Relations Board in March – the last phase of a legal marathon that started when the Hilo daily suspended, and then fired, reporter Hunter Bishop in 2005, and David Smith in 2006.

Lawyers at the hearing slogged through a mountain of paystubs, overtime logs and unemployment records. The company faces a bill of about a quarter of a million dollars, including back wages, expenses and interest.

The Tribune-Herald, the Big Island’s leading daily, also had to offer Bishop and Smith their jobs back. Bishop returned to work last year. Smith declined to come back, saying he didn’t want to subject himself to any further harassment.

The company now claims that Smith – who is owed the bulk of the back pay — took himself out of the job market in 2007 when he was forced to file for his Guild pension.

Evidence shows Smith mounted a diligent search for work, however, but was unable to find steady employment. Smith was named full-time news editor for the Hilo-based online news site, BigIslandNow.com, about 10 months ago.

He and Bishop will have to wait at least another six weeks before the case is ripe for decision – barring a settlement. Once the NLRB finishes checking its arithmetic one more time, the company lawyers get a week to double-check the figures, and then all the lawyers will take up to another 35 days to submit legal briefs.

The administrative law judge’s ruling can be appealed to the courts.

Over at West Hawaii Today, also owned by Stephens Media, editor Reed Flickinger apparently got the heave-ho from the paper on Thursday. Word is that David Bock, editor of the Tribune-Herald, will be running WHT, apparently from his office in Hilo.

Bock was in the middle of the firings of Smith and Bishop back in 2006, according to the March 2008 findings of an NLRB administrative law judge.

And just last month, a news item from the Pacific Media Workers Guild repoted:

In two days of talks last week, management of the Hawaii Tribune-Herald not only refused any pay raises, it “cautioned that a pay cut is possible if negotiations take too long and the economy worsens.” The company also seeks to delete a provision in the contract prohibiting the company from interfering with the operation of the Guild, leading the union to file an unfair labor practice charge during a caucus.

For some of the history, check out previous posts here:

DC court slaps Tribune-Herald for numerous labor law violations
April 23rd, 2012

National Labor Relations Board says Tribune-Herald owner violated labor laws
February 19th, 2011

NLRB ruling finds Hawaii Tribune-Herald and Stephens Media violated federal labor law
March 11th, 2008

Union busting in Hilo
April 28, 2006

Who cares about the Newspaper Guild’s battle with the Hawaii Tribune-Herald?

A reader’s comment posted here yesterday caught my attention and deserves a response.

With all due respect Ian, why in the world would you think the general readership of either Honolulu daily would be the least bit interested in a 5 year battle with Guild in Hilo??? I suspect the Editors there are just making a news interest level decision and not anything more sinister. It is especially true with the news content shrinking more and more to save money….other then a few die hards in local media, who really cares??

The problem is that neither Honolulu daily regularly covers labor news, at least not as labor news. Neither do our broadcast stations, with a few exceptions. Hawaii Public Radio does it’s part (Ben Markus recently reported on the Hilo situation, for example), as has PBN. But the mainstream is pretty much silent. So in one sense it’s no surprise that the Hilo situation is not considered news.

But think about it.

HSTA and furlough Fridays? Labor news. UH upheaval? Labor news. Legislative session coming up? Labor news, since organized labor is still recognized as a potent interest group. It’s just not covered as labor news, so readers don’t get much information about labor dynamics, key players, etc. The substance of a labor “beat is absent.

In this case, we’re talking about the main local newspaper in Hilo, the second largest city in the state, the seat of government for Hawaii County. And the Hawaii Tribune-Herald isn’t a stand-alone operation, since Stephens Media Group also owns a string of other publications on the island.

We’re talking about an unusual labor situation–a company renouncing its union contract–in a state which has the second-highest proportion of union members in the workforce. According to the the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Hawaii had 136,000 union members in 2008, comprising some 24.3 percent of all employed wage and salary workers. Add in the tens of thousands of union retirees, and you’ve got a major chunk of the state’s population with a stake in the issues being played out in Hilo.

I think that, objectively speaking, this qualifies the potential audience for labor news as “substantial”.

And the story has compelling elements backed by lots of documentation accumulated during what the reader acknowledges has been a five-year contract fight. They’ve had illegal firings and unfair labor practices, which translate in this case to mean employees fired for their union activities. Lots of potential human interest stories to be told by out-of-town reporters.

Politically, this is a dynamite story. Hilo is traditionally a labor town. What does this conflict mean? Does it reflect a loss of labor power in this traditional stronghold? How will it impact the 2010 elections?

Actually, for a perceptive editor, what’s not to like about this story?