Process, process, process.
That’s the briefest summary I can muster up of the Hawaii Supreme Court’s 113 page decision yesterday which found the Legislature’s Superferry rescue unconstitutional because it carved out a very narrow law applying to that single company.
Lingle and company can’t blame partisan politics on this one since the opinion was crafted by Associate Justice Jim Duffy, who Lingle appointed to the court in 2003.
The Lingle administration and the Legislature fumbled this issue from the beginning by forgetting their basic procedural checklist and getting caught up in a high-stakes speculative corporate gamble by Superferry investors. Despite DOT staff advising that they needed to begin with an environmental impact study, the state instead tried an end run at the Superferry’s behest.
The court also upheld the circuit court’s award of legal fees and costs incurred by the Sierra Club to be paid jointly by the State and Superferry.
Congratulations to Maui attorney Isaac Hall, who carried this case on his back against the collective legal talents of the state administration, the legislature, and the company while operating out of a tiny law office. A career capstone for him to be proud of, for sure!
I defer to Joan Conrow’s assessment in her KauaiEclectic blog:
Indeed, the Justices wrote in their conclusion:
That our Constitution prohibits laws which provide disparate treatment inended to favor a specific individual, class or entity or to discriinate against a specific individual, class, or entity is a fundamental principle of the democratic nature of our government: equal rights and treatment for all persons under the law.
I’m sure we’ll hear the usual cries and moans about how this sends out a message that Hawaii is a bad place to do business. But what it really sends out is the message that it’s a bad place to pull a fast one, conduct shady business and work the political process to get special favors for your business.
And it seems to me that’s a good message to send to the world.
I also have to wonder whether this ruling will have an impact on Sen. Hanabusa, who got the credit for pushing the special legislation.
And what about Gov. Head-in-the-Sand Lingle, who continues to say that her administration did everything correctly despite this series of huge legal blunders.
Here’s the Guv as quoted by the Advertiser:
“I’m sure there are all sorts of political opinions out there,” she told reporters. “But we know from the beginning we were correct and accurate, did the right thing, and we’ve been able to provide a great service for the people of Maui and O’ahu, one that they’ve come to appreciate and in some cases to depend upon, especially in the case of small businesses.”
I guess the idea is just snap your fingers, close your eyes, and the bad stuff magically goes away!
She seems to be taking the same approach to budget planning.
On to other things.
Aloha to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, which prints its last edition today.
And a friend in Minnesota recommended this essay, which she describes as “a very thoughtful consideration about the differences and connections between newspapers, journalism, and the internet.”
And I just ran into this image of Leo at his prime in the role of the character “Thunderstep” in an online game. Just scroll down to his photo, which appears just above the Thunderstep annotation. His character is described this way:
“Very wise and noble. Thunderstep is feared by most cats beacause of his very tall muscular body. Yet, this tom is quite sweet and kind.”
And so he was.

![[text]](/gallery_2009/sunrise031409/source/image/img_0164.jpg)