My simple post late yesterday with the full list of HGEA endorsements already kicked up a little dust, with a call-and-response by Keith Rollman and Gerald De Heer that is worth reading. You’ll have to scroll down to the end of that unusually long entry in order to find the comments.
De Heer, who once served in the state legislature, addressed his comment to Rollman, first saying that, in his view, the HGEA endorsement likely wraps up the Democratic gubernatorial nomination for Hannemann. Then he continues:
In this campaign, you are the de facto leader of the ‘539’ forces for Hanneman and against Neil Abercrombie. The Republicans nationally have Fox, by comparison Hanneman has you. If anything needs to be ‘spit out’ it is the nature of that relationship, how it works, and why the only connection between you and the Hanneman Campaign is coordinated by ‘coincidence’ and nothing else. How does that work?
***
Political campaigns today are about destroying opposition through any means possible. You are swift-boating here and elsewhere. And we all know how that works. The official campaign perpetuates a half-lie about an opponent, and the unofficial-official campaign raises the half lie to a full lie. Than, a third tier of operatives start push polls and other whispering tactics which, when implemented, make the original half-lie ‘truth’ and the opponent is now defined.
I appreciate De Heer’s point, but am not sure about that “539” reference. Does he mean “527” organizations, the groups making “independent” campaign expenditures that recent court decisions have further empowered?
Rollman responded directly.
My “connection” to the Hannemann campaign is one of friedship only. I’m sure the campaign spending reports were scrutinized for any professional reimbursement…it simply wasn’t there.
***
I have never made a derogatory remark about Ian, and I have tried to keep my criticism of Aberccrombie based totally on verifiable facts. You suggest that people should participate in democracy…I agree…I’m just not on your side, and I hope your candidate loses.
Fair enough.
I didn’t mean to “bury” the HGEA’s endorsement of Hannemann. I just figured that’s just about all the mainstream media has reported. Even this morning, the Star-Advertiser 2nd day story still doesn’t appear to have reported the long list of HGEA endorsements. It seems to me that those down-the-ticket endorsements have a lot of impact statewide and are certainly worth noting.
And did you notice that HSTA, the teachers’ union, walked past Senate Education Committee chairman Norman Sakamoto and House Education vice-chair Lyla Berg to endorse Gary Hooser for Lt. Governor? Congratulations to Hooser.
Once again, I can’t find any information about the HSTA endorsements on the HSTA website, and clicking on “search” returns an error message.
If the goal of the union’s endorsements is to boost their selected candidates, isn’t that best done through maximum exposure?

![[text]](http://ilind.net/images_2010/duke081110.jpg)
![[text]](http://ilind.net/misc /2010/bowers.jpg)
![[text]](http://ilind.net/misc /2010/towill.jpg)