Watch out, the smears are coming.
Just a coincidence? On the day that the HGEA endorsements of Mufi Hannemann and Brian Schatz were announced, a comment was submitted here (but not approved) taking a wildly unfair shot at L.G. candidate Brian Schatz.
The comment appeared to be well-sourced, with enough citations to Hawaii laws and using some specific figures in a way that made it seem plausible. But a closer look shows that it was very factually incorrect, misleading, and unfair.
In brief, it charactized (or mischaracterized) Helping Hands Hawaii, the nonprofit that Schatz directs, as administratively top-heavy and straying from its primary purpose, implying that the group has improperly used state funds intended for “school repair and maintenance.”
That looked odd to me, so I looked up the statutes cited as well as the history of the group.
Helping Hands Hawaii was started back in 1974 as the Volunteer, Information, and Referral Service.
In 2001, the legislature, under pressure to deal with a growing backlog of needed school repairs, moved to clear the way for public-private partnerships for repair and maintenance. Helping Hands Hawaii was designated to administer a new fund, and to solicit funds and give grants for school repair projects, with an annual independent audit of the funds (see SB493). This took place before Schatz was associated with the organization.
Two years later, in 2003, this responsibility was transferred to a new nonprofit organization, Hawaii 3R’s by SB58.
According to tax returns filed by Helping Hands Hawaii, Schatz took over as president of the group during 2003, as the school repair responsibilities were being shifted over to Hawaii 3R’s. So the implication that Helping Hands Hawaii was somehow shirking its school repair and maintenance responsibilities five years later, in 2008, was totally wrong.
Oh, and the allegation that the organization is administratively top-heavy?
According to its most recent tax return, less than 5% of its $6+ million budget goes to administration and management. That’s a very good record.
Lesson: Beware those anonymous hits at this time of the season. Do a lot of checking before giving them any credence.
Same lesson applies to the letter referred to by Keith Rollman, in which allegations of pay-to-play deals at the city are wrapped around relationships between several people in Mufi Hannemann’s campaign. Also circulating about the same time as the HGEA endorsements. Reader beware.