Taking another look at the management of Aina Koa Pono, the company selected by HECO to build and operate a biofuel refinery using an as-yet commercially untested technology. Its “board of advisors” includes company co-founder Melvin Chiogioji of Mele Associates, familiar figures like attorney Paul Alston, former HECO president and CEO Bob Clarke. Then there’s Kimberly Dey, not really a household name.
In the company-provided bio, we learn:
Kimberly Dey is CEO and owner of NumberEight (N8). N8 was created in 2010 through the partnership agreement between Nothing But Results (NBR), a locally-owned, boutique marketing company with a successful track record, and Liquid Planet Studios (LPS), one of Hawaii’s largest and most diverse HD production companies.
Hmmmm. There’s more.
An entrepreneur by nature, Dey also operates a portfolio of several other business entities, including an accomplished sport horse breeding business, which is an extension of her love for horses, competition and sport. Her horses have earned numerous national and international awards and she, herself, is an established rider who was the World Champion Amateur Hunter Rider for two consecutive years and the first Asian American to win such honors.
Then we learn why this accomplished horse breeder and champion rider is in a position to advise a company trying to upscale this technology for the first time, with electrical ratepayers statewide picking up much of the tab.
She also works as the Vice President for her father’s private charitable organization the Charles B. Wang International Foundation, which focuses internationally on children and cross-cultural affairs.
Aha. Her father is Charles Wang, the billionaire who co-founded Computer Associates back in the mid-1970s.
Interesting.
Mention that she is an officer of the Charles B. Wang International Foundation quickly led me to a New York Times story by Stephanie Strom(February 23, 2011) providing an entertaining look at hardball politics in the work of philanthropy.
Kimberly Dey and her husband made news in 2006 buying three contiguous lots along Kahala Avenue for a reported $34 million, and started planning a new house on the property. The properties were put up for sale this year for $45 million after plans for the house were dropped. The experience of evacuating during the March 11 tsunami warning made Dey reconsider the idea of oceanfront living, according to a story in PBN.
A Wikipedia profile of Dey’s father, Charles Wang, describes his career with Computer Associates as “marked with controversy.”
In building up CA, Wang engaged in fifty takeovers followed by immediate firing of top management and key employees. His strategies had provoked descriptions like “rapacious”, “heartless” and “Attila-the-Hun”, largely driven by the draconian practices he engaged in with acquired companies, although these tactics were legal in the State of New York. The most notorious of these practices included forcing the employees of an acquired company to sign new employment contracts on-the-spot at a company meeting without prior warning – employees who refused to sign at the meeting or wished to have the contracts reviewed by a third party prior to signing were immediately fired.
He also alienated many in and out of CA by his paternalistic, family-oriented management style. In 1979, three years after CA’s founding, Wang had installed his older brother Tony, a onetime corporate lawyer, as president and COO. Tony held the position until his retirement in 1992 to make way for Sanjay Kumar. In 1998, Nancy Li, Charles Wang’s second wife, was named CA’s chief technology officer. Wang has argued that the investment community was punishing CA’s stock because of his refusal to override his sense of familial loyalty to avoid the appearance of nepotism.
There’s more. You can read it here. Parts of the Wikipedia account have been challenged as lacking proper documentation, and the issue apparently has not been resolved.
All this, of course, really has nothing to do with whether or not Aina Koa Pono can pull off its engineering feat and make this renewable project work. It does, however, add a bit more background information about the power structure of Hawaii’s search for new sources of energy.
Discover more from i L i n d
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What a scaredy-cat! Not someone I would trust with my money.
Ian, one note. Electric customers will not pick up any of the tab except to pay for biofuel delivered to Keahole Power Plant or other plants that can use biodiesel. The risk of the process is entirely on AKP and it’s investors. If they don’t deliver a gallon we don’t pay a cent. Our proposal is that the cost be shared by HELCO and HECO ratepayers only. The surcharge will only be the difference between the fixed price cost of the biofuel and the cost of the oil it replaces. As oil rises that differential shrinks, before long to nothing. Spreading the cost among the 400,000 HECO customers will add only a small amount to our bills. Requiring HELCO’s tiny customer base to carry the full load would be a large and we think unfair burden. They are already getting nearly half their electricity from renewables but seeing only a small price break as many of those renewable contracts were signed back when the law required we pay the avoided cost of oil. We no longer enter into such contracts. We’ve always said that if we want to restart an agricultural energy industry in Hawaii it will take investment and paying a premium up front, a premium that should disappear as oil prices rise. And there is an unquantifiable benefit to making some liquid fuel here in the islands, as Pacific Biodiesel and others can attest. Biofuel can be relatively easily be moved among the islands by barge, no cable needed, so other islands sharing in the start up cost does not seem so harsh, at least to me. We’ve moved people, products and services among the islands for a long time. Heretofore, energy only moved one way, from ports and refineries on Oahu to the Neighbor Islands. Oahu bears the burden of enough port facilities and refining capacity to serve the Neighbor Islands and it’s own needs, saving other islands from that burdenm which would be much more expensive on a smaller NI scale. Why is it so hard to imagine energy or fuel moving from the NIs to Oahu, it they have the resources and we have the needs (part of those needs being, of course, the many ways Oahu supports the other islands).
Kimberly Dey & her husband were also behind the bizarre & unsuccessful land swap deal from several years ago that involved Kailua High School (http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Aug/02/ln/FP608020349.html).
I had forgotten about that proposal. Thank you.
So what’s the reason for the pot shot at a women who’s clearly trying to make some good things happen in Hawaii?!
Peter’s points were also shared by Robby Alm last night at “Securing our Future: A Conversation on Energy Options in Hawaii”.
The Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaii is hosting two more Monday night energy conversations. Here are the last two, which were live streamed. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/environmental-caucus
They have done a fantastic job of bringing stakeholders and the public together. Lots of neighbor island participation, lots of great information. Here is the link to the event page: http://environmentalcaucusofthedemocraticpartyofhawaii.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/securing-our-future-a-conversation-on-energy-options-in-hawaii/
(They are being held in the former Stuart Anderson’s space at Ward Warehouse, also former Abercrombie campaign hq, just in case anyone wondered why all the photos.)
I read nothing of any substance here. Just a spotty account of some of this woman’s accomplishments and an even less accurate description of one of the members of her family. You make no point in your rambling…