Staying aloof from the Sanders-Clinton battle

I admit that I’ve been trying to stay out of the increasingly bitter arguments between supporters of the two Democratic presidential candidates.

I’m not a fan of Senator Sanders, despite agreeing with most of his big picture political critiques.

On the other hand, I had some personal history with the Clintons during my reporting career, stemming back to my reporting on at least one part of what became known as the Asian fundraising scandal that grew out of Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign. In fact, my first story after joining the staff of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin in 1993 was about the initial stages of an FBI investigation into the activities of a couple from Hawaii who had moved to the mainland to do fundraising for the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign. It gave me insights into the larger campaign and the insider relationships with the Clinton camp that were very unsettling. And although that’s somewhat ancient history, the experience leaves me less than enthusiastic about Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Here are a few of the stories from that period.

The first published account of the links between former Hawaii
consultant Nora Lum and then-Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown, and
allegations of campaign fundraising abuses involving a company they
controlled, appeared in the Star-Bulletin in September 1995, months
before the issues broke in the national media. Nora Lum and her
husband, Gene, later became the first to be convicted in the
fundraising investigation.

  • Ex-islander “looted” Oklahoma firm, suit claims. Case involves
    links to Clinton administration. Sept
    1, 1995
  • Ron Brown not involved, official says, but Commerce
    Secretary’s son is company director. Sept
    2, 1995
  • Oklahoma company headed by ex-islanders linked to illegal
    $15,000 campaign gift.
    Oct 18, 1995
  • Lums linked to golf course projects and contributions. Gene
    Lum cited Fifth Amendment when questioned last year about $10,000
    contribution to Gov. Waihee. Oct
    18, 1995
  • Isle woman part of campaign probe. Former resident Nora Lum
    figures in a congressional investigation into ’92 finances.
    Congressional investigators have renewed a probe of former Hawaii
    resident Nora T. Lum, and a 1992 campaign project which she
    headed. Oct
    28, 1996
  • Lum’s windfall, Dem donations under scrutiny. A “no money
    down” investment apparently yielded a windfall of $8 million or
    more in just a few months for an Oklahoma company controlled by
    Democratic contributor and fundraiser Nora Lum. Nov
    4, 1996

And I recall how terrible it was to see President Bill Clinton take anti-progressive positions on criminal justice issues and welfare reform. At the time, it was argued that these positions were necessary to ward off even worse legislation that would otherwise have come out of the Congress. Perhaps. But it didn’t make it any easier to swallow Clinton’s pivot to the right.

So this year, I’m not enthusiastic about either Sanders’ “idealism” or Hillary Clinton’s “realism”.

I know that I’m far from alone in feeling the fact that there were really no more than two potentially viable candidates is unfortunate. Hillary really was successful at sucking up political resources very early on, leaving other potential rivals with little to work with.

There’s a disquieting sense that Clinton’s early insider organizing artificially limited the choices for Democratic voters.

And a friend recently shared his concern that this could very well backfire on the party before the convention. He agrees with the view that Clinton’s campaign will likely lead to the nomination, despite all her problems.

He summarizes his view in query aimed at Clinton: “Is it right to lose, or risk losing, the presidency because you feel entitled?”

He fears that her campaign could melt down if any one of the many bits of political baggage she carries suddenly blows up into a hot new public scandal.

Realistically, she’s not about to withdraw.

Equally realistically, Democrats need to ponder that “what if”…

Our friend believes there’s still a chance for Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren to step up if “drafted”…A brokered convention, perhaps, sidestepping both candidates?

And the campaign season marches on.


Discover more from i L i n d

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

6 thoughts on “Staying aloof from the Sanders-Clinton battle

  1. zzzzzz

    Perhaps the reason Sanders has done as well as he has is not so much based on who he is, and what he espouses, as much as that he isn’t Hillary Clinton.

    Reply
  2. Juicy_J

    I care about the general election a whole hell of a lot more than the primary. It’s where the real choice is to be made.

    Reply
  3. Allen N.

    Your friend doesn’t think Michael Bloomberg could make a run? The man is a very smart politician. He smells blood coming from the Clinton camp. And I don’t picture Liz Warren taking on Bernie.

    Reply
  4. Ann

    To be honest, Trump is much more scarier than Clinton and Sanders. Clinton has more experience on the international stage than Sanders which I think is very important. What are your reservations with Sanders?

    Reply
  5. Patty

    I like the Green Party Candidate, Dr. Jill Stein, position on issues that would make for a better, healthier, safer AMERICA. We were never meant to have a two party to divide the spoils.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.