Category Archives: Economics

Lower gas prices are nice, but geopolitics behind them suggest dangers

I’ll say it up front–I don’t understand the complicated economics and geopolitics behind the rapid slide in the international price of oil.

But its clear that the there’s a lot going on, and a lot that we should be paying attention to, beyond the pleasant relief we feel at the gas pumps.

I searched for something like “geopolitics of oil price drop” and found lots of competing theories, some very disquieting if you worry at all about issues of war and peace.

NY Times columnist Tom Friedman has suggested the decline in oil prices could be part of a U.S. effort to undermine the economies of Russia and Iran (“A Pump War?“).

Friedman isn’t alone. For example, check this recent column from OilPrice.com (“Did The Saudis And The US Collude In Dropping Oil Prices?“).

Another theory is that Saudi Arabia is pushing prices lower, and not compensating by lowering production, in order to undermine the boom in U.S. shale oil production. The U.S. has increased its domestic oil production, but the boom relies on high oil prices to sustain the high-cost production techniques.

Here are some articles reflecting this perspective.

Financial Timnes, “Falling oil price raises questions on viability of shale.”

OilPrice.com, “Low Oil Prices Hurting U.S. Shale Operations.”

Business Insider, “The Pace At Which US Rig Counts Are Tumbling Is Unusually Intense.”

Then it starts getting complicated.

Reuters, “Saudi Arabia is playing chicken with its oil.”

The kingdom has two targets in its latest oil war: it is trying to squeeze U.S. shale oil—which requires higher prices to remain competitive with conventional production—out of the market. More broadly, the Saudis are also punishing two rivals, Russia and Iran, for their support of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in the Syrian civil war. Since the Syrian uprising began in 2011, regional and world powers have played out a series of proxy battles there.

While Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been arming many of the Syrian rebels, the Iranian regime—and to a lesser extent, Russia—have provided the weapons and funding to keep Assad in power.

Since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, the traditional centers of power in the Arab world—Egypt, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states—have been nervous about the growing influence of Iran: its nuclear ambitions, its sway over the Iraqi government, its support for the militant groups Hezbollah and Hamas, and its alliance with Syria.

The conflict is now a full-blown proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia, which is playing out across the region. Both sides increasingly see their rivalry as a winner-take-all conflict: if the Shi’ite Hezbollah gains an upper hand in Lebanon, then the Sunnis of Lebanon—and by extension, their Saudi patrons—lose a round to Iran. If a Shi’ite-led government solidifies its control of Iraq, then Iran will have won another round.

Today, the House of Saud rushes to shore up its allies in Bahrain, Yemen, Syria and wherever else it fears Iran’s nefarious influence. And the kingdom is striking back at Iran, and Russia, with its most effective weapon.

Center for Geopolitical Analysis, “It’s dangerous to corner Russia too much.”

In any case, oil politics is complicated, interesting, and potentially dangerous.

Please share any good explanations or analyses if/when you find them.

Army seeking community reactions to potential cuts

The Army is inviting community feedback on potential cuts in the number of personnel and family members based in Hawaii.

Two “listening sessions” are currently scheduled.

January 27, 6:30-9 p.m., Hale Koa Hotel, DeRussy Hall.

January 28, 6:30-9 p.m., Leilehua High School Cafeteria.

According to the meeting announcement:

The Army wants to know what impacts a potential reduction of Soldiers, family members, and civilian employees in Hawaii would have on you or your organization.

The public is invited to attend Army-hosted community listening sessions, regarding proposed Army personnel reductions in Hawaii, to provide input and learn more. The Army will explain the process that will be used to reach stationing decisions.
No decisions have been made yet.

See the full meeting notice.

See the full study of potential Army force reductions.

(To find the document on the website, look under the brown section heading titled “Programmatic EA.” The study is titled “Final Finding of No Significant Impact for Army 2020 Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Force Structure Realignment.”)

Making the case for downsizing Hawaii’s military presence

I have to admit that I wasn’t really aware of the Oahu Council for Army Downsizing until I saw news of a Honolulu Ethics Commission opinion dismissing concerns over use of public resources to promote a Chamber of Commerce petition against any Army cuts.

The Oahu Council takes the view that the Army’s budget cutting offers a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for Hawaii to lessen the military’s control of scarce land and resources, providing a huge benefit to the general public.

From the group’s website:

The OCAD wants the people of Hawaii and Oahu to understand the goodness that can occur if the Army is downsized in the quantities proposed by DoD. The OCAD believes the cuts proposed should occur in the near term and that the following bases and geographic areas be returned to the State of Hawaii: Schofield Barracks, Wheeler Army Airfield, Makua Valley, Dillingham Military Reservation, and Kolekole pass with unimpeded access on Lualualei Naval Road.

The OCAD believes the DoD’s recommendation for cuts provides a ‘once–in–a–century’ opportunity for Hawaii Nei; if military forces on Oahu are not cut during this round of force structure cuts, then nothing will change on Oahu militarily — there will never be another round of cuts like this for Hawaii in any of our lifetimes.

Their website is also full of links to documents, those spelling out the Army’s planning process, and critical responses by the council and its members, along with a number of videos of presentations explaining the issues.

The council takes the position that without the political clout of the late Dan Inouye, Hawaii is going to have a hard time avoiding cuts. And if significant cuts are ahead, then we should be cutting the best deal that we can, one that involves the transfer of military lands and resources back to the local community.

Their point of view needs to get a lot more attention. This isn’t a new issue. The economic arguments in favor of the conversion of military facilities to civilian use have been around for decades, and many places on the mainland have gone through the process of conversion. It needs to at least be recognized as a legitimate option.

Highly recommended.

Takai names deputy chief of staff

Freshman Congressman Mark Takai has named another of outgoing Rep. Coleen Hanabusa’s staff to serve as his deputy chief of staff and legislative director.

Sean Callahan was previously a legislative assistant for Hanabusa beginning in May 2011, ending with the title “señor military legislative assistant.”

Callahan graduated from UH Manoa in 2011 with a BA in economics and political science, and earned an masters degree in international affairs from American University last year.

Callahan joins Rod Tanonaka, who is taking over as Takai’s chief of staff after holding the same position in Hanabusa’s office.