Category Archives: Genealogy

Seeking Mapala123

This is an example of the kind of small mysteries that continually arise as a result of DNA testing.

I’ve done DNA tests with several companies. My sister first pushed me to take a test with Family Tree DNA, which was for Y-DNA, that is passed down father to son, generation after generation. She was interested in the history of the Lind side of the family, which explained her interest in Y-DNA.

Later, again with her encouragement, I did additional testing of so-called “autosomal” DNA, which is inherited from both parents.

This question comes out of the DNA testing by Ancestry.com, considered the largest company doing consumer DNA tests.

Ancestry produces a list of people who match your DNA, with the amount and nature of the overlap, and the total amount of shared DNA.

Ancestry divides matches into several categories. The first is “Close Family.” There my list includes known relatives, a half-brother and half-sister; a couple of grand nieces; several children of my cousins; and one of my Lind grandmother’s relatives in Scotland. None of these were surprises or mysteries, and all reportedly share at least 5% of my DNA.

The next category is “Extended Family.” Most of those in this category share between 1% and 4% of DNA with me. The top match in this “extended family” category is a woman using the name “Mapala123.” Ancestry reports we are related on my maternal line.

She is followed by a known relative, a daughter of one of my paternal cousins in Long Beach, California, making her a 1st cousin 1x removed.

I share almost the same amount of DNA with each of these top extended family matches.

My relation to my cousin’s daughter is clear. My relation to Mapala123 is unknown, a complete mystery. Ancestry estimates we are 2nd cousins, based on the pattern of DNA overlap. That would mean that our grandparents were siblings. In my book, that’s a pretty close connection and should make it possible to identify Mapala and our family relationship.

That would be meaningful because knowing their identity could, in turn, help identify others who are a little more distant genetically. Each unknown that gets identified potentially leads to more discoveries.

But finding Mapala123 isn’t proving easy.

I’ve reached out through Ancestry’s messaging system, which enables ways to reach those who remain anonymous. No answer, which is not really surprising. Not many people check on their Ancestry messages. I know that I only very occasionally peek to see if I’ve gotten any new messages.

A search of Newspapers.com found the 1931 obituary of a Leonard Mapala published in the Honolulu Advertiser. He was born in Kaupo, Maui, in 1879. This is probably a hint, because the Hawaiian side of my mother’s family came from that area on Maui between Keanae and Kaupo. At the time of his death, he was reported to be a carpenter living in Kaimuki. A second newspaper story said Mapala had been sick and directed not to drink alcoholic beverages, but went on a binge despite the warning and died.

Another clipping shows Mapala was a 39-year old soldier who had been inducted into military service in 1918, according to a clipping in the Pacific Commercial Advertiser, and was reported as a deserter the following year.

My online search also turned up an essay by John Kelly Jr., son of the hawaii artist and a founder of the Save Our Surf organization in the 1960s which is credited with saving numerous surf breaks from destruction.

John and Kate Kelly’s son, John Kelly Jr., grew up as a Hawaiian boy, swimming, surfing, diving, fishing, and learning from the neighboring k?naka maoli, Native Hawaiians. This account was written about the man named Mapala, who, as a kupuna, mentor, and the boy’s adopted grandfather, taught John Jr., who he called Keoni, to fish and relate to the sea with respect and a deep reverence.

Kelly Jr. wrote about Mapala in an essay now available online, and Mapala was captured in some of the senior Kelly’s art:

Screenshot

Mapala taught me all he knew about the sea, the moi, how to spot their fins in the swirling foam waters of Lae o Kupikipikio (Point of Spouting Waters, or Black Point). He showed me how to make heavy aho (cotton) nets with the Hawaiian knot for the rough waters, and light linen nets for ‘ama ‘ama (mullet) for inshore reef waters. He knew the comings and goings of inshore fishes according to moon cycles, tides and spawning seasons. He showed me where to pick opihi and ha’uke’uke (limpets), to catch the darting ‘a’ama (black crab) for uhu (parrotfish) bait.

Black Point, where Kelly’s adventures with Mapala took place, wasn’t far from a a lot near the beach in Kahala where my mother found a cousin who had been raised by his grandfather in or around Hana. Perhaps just a coincidence, I don’t know.

In any case, I’m grasping at straws here.

Any suggestions about how to find Mapala123 would be welcomed.

A Happy St. Patrick’s Feline Friday!

Would a DNA test show whether any of our cats can trace their heritage back to Ireland? Probably not. But my own DNA appears to include a healthy dose of the Irish, for good or ill.

My great-grandfather on my mom’s maternal side, Robert William Cathcart, was born in County Down, Ireland, on January 20, 1856, and arrived in Hawaii when he was 25.

This is the estimate of my DNA origins produced by Ancestry.com. It varies somewhat from the answers produced by two other testing services, but seems to be based on a more robust system with more specificity than provided by the other two. And, since both my dad’s parents were born in Scotland, it certainly appears believable.

According to the obituary published by the Honolulu Advertiser on May 18, 1915, Cathcart dropped dead of an apparent heart attack at about 11 a.m. while walking along the Ewa side of Alakea Street opposite the Von Hamm Young garage, which was located in that block between Hotel and King streets. He was 59.

Born In Ireland: The deceased was bonn in County Down,
Ireland on January 20, 1856 and was fifty nine years
ago. He was an expert accountant and held positions in
Honolulu and other parts of the Islands during his long
residence here. He was at times connected with commercial
concerns in Honolulu.Mr. Cathcart was head clerk and chief
accountant of the finance department of the city govern-
ment. He was a Democrat, who aspired to many political
positions unsuccessfully.

Well, so much for family DNA. Meanwhile, the cats have been waiting in the wings, and I think it’s time to unleash them.

So, without further ado….

Feline Friday 3-17-2023

Ancestry.com fine tunes its analysis of Hawaii and Pacific islands DNA

Ancestry.com has updated the computer algorithm it uses to assess its ethnicity estimates, providing more detailed results for those with Pacific ancestries.

Those following this blog for a while know that I’ve been struggling to make sense of the results of several DNA tests I’ve done since my late sister, Bonnie, talked me into it as a way for her to extend her understanding of our father’s roots in Scotland.

The DNA, however, led in a different direction.

I’ve ended up doing tests through three different companies–ancestry.com, familytreendna.com, and myheritage.com. The companies differ in the size and makeup of the DNA database that they use to interpret the broad sweep of family history and ethnicity. Each company, based on their own database, produces slightly different lists of DNA “matches.”

It turned out that Bonnie’s carefully researched Lind family genealogy which she painstakingly traced back over a number of generations through records in Scotland was undermined several generations back when there was apparently a “non-paternity event,” something that disrupted the apparent family tree. In other words, it appears that one of my male Lind ancestors was adopted, or perhaps, as my mother would say, “someone jumped the fence,” as in an extra-marital relationship. Shocking, I know, but par for the course, I’ve come to believe.

In any case, my DNA tests turned up surprisingly few genetic Lind relatives. But they have turned up hundreds of Maori “cousins” going back around four generations. It’s that connection that I’ve been trying to untangle.

In the past week, Ancestry sent out notices that it has made changes to its ethnicity estimates.

Ancestry is constantly updating our technology and cutting-edge science. As we update our algorithm and reference panel, your results may change. Additionally, as we add more and more customers to our AncestryDNA database, we hope to increase the number and granularity of our ethnicity regions, making each update more precise.

We calculate your AncestryDNA ethnicity estimate by comparing your DNA to a reference panel made up of thousands of DNA samples from people with long family histories in one place or within one group. Our reference panel is robust due to the millions of family trees linked to our DNA customers. For this update, Ancestry’s team of scientists increased the AncestryDNA reference panel size we use to make ethnicity estimates. The updated reference panel has more samples from more parts of the world to increase the total number of regions available for analysis from 77 to 84.

Because this update is more precise overall, many users will see improvements in their ethnicity estimates as percentages change. Others will see new or updated regions in their estimates. Ancestry will continue to work to expand the diversity of our products to provide more precise ethnicity estimates to our customers.

Previously, Ancestry calculated that my DNA included 13% traced to “EasternPolynesia&New Zealand Maori,” which included Hawaii. That’s just about what I would expect, since I am 1/8 Hawaiian (my great-grandmother was Hawaiian, and my grandmother and mother married non-Hawaiians).

In the most recent Ancestry update, the category has been split, so they now estimate my background as Scotland (42%), Ireland (30%), Hawaii (9%), England and Northwestern Europe (8%), New Zealand Maori (4%), Sweden and Denmark (4%), Wales (2%), and Tonga (1%).

To tell the truth, I don’t know how or whether this will assist me in tracing the Maori connection. I subscribe to another genetic genealogy site, Gedmatch.com, which offers software to do different types of DNA analysis with links to traditional genealogical research and family trees. But, for now, it’s beyond my skill level.

It seems unlikely that I’ll ever identify the source of that Maori DNA. My understanding is that these “autosomal” identify ancestors over more recent generations rather than the kinds of DNA tests that trace back to the beginning of time. But I’m just trying to learn more, a bit at a time. That’s what it’s all about, isn’t it?

A family journal

This is just a bit of miscellaneous family history, for those who find such useless bits of interest.

This is a handwritten chart of my lineage down my maternal grandfather’s line. My mother inscribed this on one of the front pages when presenting me a copy of “The Journal of James Yonge, Plymouth Surgeon [1647-1721].” It was published by Archon Books, Hamden, Connecticut, in 1963.

The first in this line, James Yonge, was born in 1647, and I followed 300 years later in 1947.

From the book jacket:

THE JOURNAL OF JAMES YONGE

The journal of James Yonge, doctor and pioneer,
is perhaps the most important English diary of
the seventeenth century to be published since
Pepys’ and Evelyn’s. Of the same period as the
diaries of Pepys and Evelyn, Yonge’s depicts
aspects of life which they described as spectators,
but in which he was intimately involved. Yonge
spent many years as ship’s surgeon while Pepys was
an administrator of the Royal Navy; during the
Dutch wars Yonge tended the sick and wounded
himself, while Evelyn was a Commissioner.
Later, Yonge was elected a Fellow of the Royal
Society, an honour which he shared with Pepys
and Evelyn.

James Yonge emerges as a man of common-sense,
firm opinions and shrewd judgement: a man to
be trusted, an excellent witness. His hardships as a
prisoner-of-war of the Dutch are described
objectively and with little rancour against the
enemy; on his return to London after the Great
Fire he is astonished that the citizens should
accept their situation so casually. Later when his
practice was well established in Plymouth, the
records of his many visits to London provide
glimpses of contemporary history. He enjoys
showing his wife the new buildings of London
and chatting with scientists and savants in taverns
and coffee-houses. He lists the contents of the
Oxford Museum and describes the congenial
entertainment offered him at the University.