Tag Archives: linda lingle

Don’t be fooled by Lingle’s campaign

In her own words:

“I think I’m of the same breed as McCain and Palin.”

Linda Lingle, September 2008.

Lingle’s current U.S. Senate campaign would prefer to forget all of the fawning over Sarah Palin, and “palling around” with the rest of the Republican right.

Let’s just keeping reminding people of Lingle’s actual record.

Her campaign now proclaims:

“People Come First, and Linda Lingle is Listening.”

Tell that to the parents, students, and community supporters who staged a sit-in at Gov. Lingle’s office to protest teacher furloughs and cancelled school days.

“Gov. Lingle told us that she would not meet with people like us. People like us? We’re regular people. We speak for 170,000 school students in Hawai’i. We are your constituents. It is your job to listen to us.”
Marguerite Higa, one of the women arrested for refusing to leave the governor’s office.

NJ Governor rethinking planned $8.7 billion train tunnel…could it happen here?

New Jersey’s Republican governor is reportedly considering pulling the plug on a long-planned $8.7 billion transit tunnel, despite 20 years of planning and $6 billion in federal and state funding commitments, according to a New York Times story yesterday.

The tunnel, which was scheduled to be completed in 2017, was designed to double the capacity for passengers traveling between Manhattan and New Jersey. Its planners have said that it would create 6,000 construction jobs, reduce congestion and pollution and spur $660 million in annual economic activity in the metropolitan area. Without it, they said, the region must rely on a century-old, two-track tunnel from New Jersey to Pennsylvania Station in New York that is already nearing capacity.

A Bloomberg news update says the cancelation will be announced at a press conference this afternoon.

The latest move follows a temporary moratorium on state spending for the project imposed last month.

You have to wonder whether Gov. Lingle, who is open about her national Republican aspirations, may find political benefit in following suit.

Gov. Lingle accuses Associated Press of “blatant lies”about her administration’s budget cuts

Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle made the following remarks during a December 21, 2009 press conference to discuss the supplemental budget she has submitted to the 2010 Legislature. It refers to an AP story that appeared in the NY Times and many other newspapers.

It will be interesting to see how her comparisons to budget priorities in other states will stand up to scrutiny.

Before I talk about the budget specifically, something happened over the weekend that I feel compelled to talk about with you. And it concerned me so much, its very unusual for me to talk about the media in any specific way, and those of you who have covered me for 8 years know that I don’t call you out, I don’t complain about stories, my background is in journalism, I studied journalism, in fact I’m a print journalist by background, and for me as a print journalist in school, the epitome of print journalism, those we sought to be like, were those in the wire services, because they were supposed to be the most objective, they were supposed to the least biased of anyone in journalism because they were writing for a national audience, international audience, they had no local ties, they could be very, very objective.

And over the weekend, that image of the wire service was shattered when the Associated Press ran a story that has now run all over the world. and I’m going to read you a paragraph from the story and then talk about this in more detail.

It says:

Hawaii’s money troubles are creating a society more befitting a tropical backwater than a state celebrating its 50th anniversary and preparing to welcome President Obama home for Christmas this week.

One of the things you’re taught in journalism school is that words have consequences and what you learn later in life is that even falsehoods have consequences, and its certainly false that Hawaii is a tropical backwater.

The damage this does to the people of Hawaii is immense. The Associated Press owes an apology to the people of Hawaiik, they are impacting their livelihood by putting out this kind of false information because people’s livelihood is relying on the visitor industry and now this very false picture of hawai has been spread around the world. It also affects our economy in a negative way because it gives our own people a false impression of how we’re dealing with the issues facing our state. And let me read you another piece from this article that is just patently false and I’ll point out with evidence that in fact it is patently false.

This article says and I’m quoting directly from the article, it says, it had been talking about the cuts that had been made in different departments around the country and diff services, and it says:

But Hawaii stands apart in how its government response has been to reduce what are generally considered to be core functions: education, public health, elections and services for the disadvantaged.

So he says unlike any other, we stand apart in how we ripped these services from people. And here are some examples, and these are very easy to find, all you have to do is go online and go to one specific site, this is the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities put out of washington, DC, its a nonprofit organization, and I don’t know how its tied to any political party, and it gives these examples. Now again, this article is saying we’re different, we’re ripping apart everything unlike every other state in America. But let me read you what other states are doing.

In California, tuition at the Universities have been increased by 32 percent and enrollments cut by 12,000. In Michigan, financial aid was cut by 61%. In Washington State, University of Washington had their funding reduced 26% and Washington State almost 30%. HEre’s a list of programs for the elderly and disabled cut in 24 states, k-12 cut in 27 states, colleges and universities cut in 36 states. Ohio has eliminated virtually all state funding for mental health treatment for individuals who are not eligible for medicaid, in Rhode Island low income elderly must pay higher rates for adult day care. Tennessee has reduced community based services for people with intellectual disabilities and cut nursing services for some adults with serious disabilities.

Virginia has decreased reimbursements for special hospitals serving people with needs relating to mental health, mental retardation or substance abuse, The state has also reduced pass through grants for various aging programs and funding for local mental health providers. Other states have capped or reduced funding for programs of people who have disabilities or are elderly, including California, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah and Washington.

So its clear in fact that the kind of cuts that are occuring across the nation are severe, they are impacting people, they are the kind of cuts we did our best to avoid, our departments have been creative, they’ve been innovative, they’ve found ways for the private sector to pick up the slack, and yet this article comes out and just patently lies about the approaches that we’re taking, paints a false picture for visitors who may come to our state, and tells our own people that somehow we are doing things worse than any other state, when in fact it’s simply not true.

So again, for the Associated Press, we deserve, this kind of criticism in public, and you owe to the people of Hawaii an apology, these are just patently false statements, and again, I think the entire media would agree it’s very unusual for me to call you on anything because I respect what you do, I understand the difficult job you have, I know you’re trying your best to present a fair and clear picture to people, but this was no attempt at any level to be fair, to be objective, or even to be truthful.

Another example of how better reporting could change public debate on fiscal crisis

A short essay by UH Professor John Rieder criticizes the failure of reporters to follow-up on a question put to Gov. Lingle concerning a possible increase in the general excise tax to provide additional revenue during the current fiscal crisis.

Lingle’s reply was that raising the excise tax would make the recession worse, thereby actually resulting in even lower state revenues. The Democratic legislature actually did raise taxes last session, she went on; they raised the income tax, the hotel tax, and the fee on conveyances. But all of that “produced lower revenues” this year.

The interviewers, pressing forward with other questions, did not stop to ask Lingle whether she seriously meant to claim that these increases in taxes were responsible for the reduced revenues. Thus they let pass without comment an argument that no high school teacher would let a student get away with, a blatant and egregious example of the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy. I wish that they had challenged her instead.

Rieder then suggests a series of critical questions and comments he wished reporters had made.

Above all, I wish they had asked why the effects of a rise in excise tax would be worse than closing K-12 schools for nearly four weeks a year, with the incalculable impact of that closure upon the education and future prospects of the students, or why it would be worse than the effect of those closures upon the work and productivity of their parents as they re-arrange schedules, scurry to provide child care, and so on.

Rieder concludes:

But, for whatever reason, the reporters did not challenge the logically bankrupt anti-tax ideology Lingle was repeating. That leaves it up to the rest of us—to anyone with a voice and a venue, whether it be a conversation, a blog, or a classroom—to make the case that free public K-12 education is essential to the health of our society, and that taxes are not the anathema that Reagan-era Republicans have successfully convinced people they are, but rather are the legitimate and proper way for the government to raise money to pay for the services we the public want and demand it to provide.

Hmmmm. Should it be a surprise that this is not a perspective likely to be portrayed favorably the corporate media?