Here’s a small but significant example of how misreporting can confuse the public and impact public opinion about university contract negotiations.
A lot of those who teach on the University of Hawaii’s Manoa campus were surprised by an October 7 news item broadcast by KGMB, which reported:
The average salaries for tenured professors at UH Manoa range from $115,000 a year to $147,000.
In the academic world, “Professor” refers to the highest academic rank, usually achieved only after decades of teaching and research, and promotions via a rigorous peer review process. To the public, however, “professor” is a term which generally refers to all instructional faculty.
The figures broadcast by KGMB appear relatively accurate for those at the acadmic rank of “Professor”, often referred to as “full Professor”, but are wildly misleading if applied to all UH faculty.
In 2003, the last year for which data are readily available, there were 569 faculty at the rank of Professor out of the 2,529 faculty on the Manoa campus, just 22.5 percent of all faculty and 38 percent of instructional faculty. Since that time, a number of lower ranking assistant professors have been hired. [See Table 1 of this 2003 UH report.]
According to an annual salary study by the American Association of University Professors, those at the highest rank of Professor at UH Manoa have an average salary of $116,800.
Associate Professors average $88,200; Assistant Professors, $74,400; and Instructors, $58,700.
In addition, “average” salary figures are skewed by significantly higher salary scales in certain parts of the university, including the law school, medical school, and certain sciences.
Jon Goldberg-Hiller, a professor of political science, set about tracking down the source of the misleading numbers. His series of emails have been circulating to all faculty and drawing a considerable response.
Goldberg-Hiller first emailed KGMB reporter Jim Mendoza.
In regards to your story on the teach-in yesterday: how did you get the figures for the pay of a tenured professor. I assure you that I have tenure and am paid far below your minimum posted on the news. Most of my colleagues, when given tenure, make about $70,000 per year. That’s 40% below your “minimum”. Figures like this only hurt us and deflect from the important story we are trying to tell about our commitment to education.
Mendoza replied that the numbers came from Greg Takayama, special assistant to the Manoa Chancellor Virginia Hinshaw.
Golberg-Hiller then contacted Takayama, who confirmed that he had provided Mendoza with the data. But Takayama said his office was not the source.
In response to a request for information from KGMB-9, I informed reporter Jim Mendoza that the average salary of a 9-month tenured (instructional) professor at UHM is $115, 073; and the average for an 11-month professor is $147,817. These figures were provided by the VCAA’s office.
In a later email, Takayama added:
I was asked the average salary for a UH Manoa professor – that is the information I obtained and provided, as best I could.
Goldberg-Hiller continued to press Takayama on the issue, noting that “the differences in salary are considerable as are the political implications of these various figures.”
Yesterday, Takayama emailed another set of salary figures to KGMB’s Mendoza.
In the interests of clarity and more accurate disclosure – I am providing additional information on the salary average and range of tenured UH Manoa professors (the ranks of tenured professors include both full and associate professors):
Salary range for 9-month associate professors is $67,632-133,731. Average is $87,381.
Salary range for 9-month full professors is $79,029-208,317. Average is $115,073.
I hope this helps correct and more fully explain the information I provided earlier.
And this has not put an end to the reverberations.
Cynthia Franklin, a Professor of English, posted the following comment to the Google Group, “Preserving Hawaii’s University” yesterday afternoon.
I don’t have Gregg Takayama’s email address but I hope you will let him know that this “correction” needs immediate correction.
I am a full professor who is nearly $10,000 beneath the lowest figure he cites and I doubt that I am alone (in fact I know I’m not).
The initial figures given to the media do urgently need correction, but the correction needs to be accurate and not just another inflation of the numbers that will serve political purposes. I can’t imagine the administration does not have access to these figures. Or, on the other hand, perhaps those of us who are off the charts here can hold the administration to their figures and petition for quite substantial raises.


