The following first appeared on Andrew Cooper’s blog, “A Darker View,” and is cross-posted here with his permission. Cooper is an electrical engineer who works on Mauna Kea, and says he is also “a photographer, an amateur astronomer, a telescope maker and more.”
Walking into the building I saw the first sign. A prominent message placed in the windshield of a car parked by the entrance… “TMT, Too Many Telescopes” The protesters were here. I had hoped they would not be, we had things to get done in this meeting. A disruption of the meeting by protesters would mean another delay.
The event was the regularly scheduled meeting of the Mauna Kea Management Board. The board is a group of community members who volunteer their time to the work of protecting Mauna Kea. I was here because Keck Observatory wants to install a set of new weather instruments atop our building and domes. Any change to the external appearance of the structure, however minor, requires approval of the Kahu Ku Mauna council, the Mauna Kea Management Board and the Department of Land and Natural Resources.
To that end I had written a proposal for the new instruments with a description of exactly what we wished to do. Attached is an appendix of photos and drawings to answer any possible questions. I was present to answer the inevitable questions I had not thought of and feared would get asked.
The room was filling rapidly when we arrived, far beyond the usual audience of one of these meetings. As I greeted the many people I know, I noted many new faces. They seemed out of place, a little on edge, a sense of having entered enemy territory. Many of those present were young, in their teens and early twenties, one a young mother, child carried in her arms. The t-shirts betrayed their allegiance, they came with cameras and poorly concealed protest signs.
I have no problem with those who oppose the telescopes atop Mauna Kea attending a meeting like the OMKM board meeting. Public participation is a good thing. Indeed, these meetings are open to the public for a reason, to allow anyone interested to attend and to see for themselves how those charged with managing the mountain do their jobs.
I worried about a protest that would disrupt the meeting, making it impossible to accomplish anything. This did not happen. I will give those who attended credit for showing respect for the proceedings and to those discussing the effort of caring for the mountain.
As each item of board business was discussed the board members would ask questions first, followed by a chance for anyone in attendance to ask questions. It was then that the newcomers took their turn to express themselves and ask questions. All questions were given due respect, everyone listened. It was listening to those questions that I found interesting. Many of the questions asked by telescope opponents betrayed their ignorance of the significant effort that goes into caring for the mountain every day.
It is not just about telescopes. It is all aspects of land management… Native and endemic species monitoring, habitat restoration, invasive species monitoring and removal, visitor and tourism issues. All of these are covered by the management plan, all are managed by people who care about Mauna Kea. Many are professionals who have had their efforts called into question repeatedly in recent weeks.
There were summary reports from the entomologists who have been monitoring the native species and watching for invasives. The w?kiu bugs seem to have had a good winter. Reports on the volunteer efforts tallied the thousands of hours that people have spent pulling invasive weeds and running the visitor information station. The additional stress of the ongoing protest has strained the available facilities and personnel. Two additional part time rangers have been hired and are now on the job to assist.
At least one attendee, a protester who had camped out on the mountain from the start of the protests, made accusations about the actions of university staff. The issue was of course the discovery of invasive ants in the thatching material brought up to Hale Pohaku by the protesters to build a hale. How did the biologist find the ants when they did not? A UH biologist responded to the insulting accusations with style. Explaining that an untrained eye can easily miss many insects. He offered to take anyone interested outside after the meeting and show them just what he and his students do. How they monitor the arthropod populations of Mauna Kea. His enthusiasm for insects was infectious, I think he had a few who accepted his offer.
Since its adoption five years ago the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan is the governing document of Mauna Kea. The MKCMP and its sub-plans attempt to cover all aspects of human activity on Mauna Kea. Subjects such as public access and cultural resource management are addressed in sub-plans that require special attention. It is these documents that proscribe the activities of all of the mountain users; the observatories, the public tour companies, the natural resource managers.
The plan is not complete, there is no way it could be. There are sections that are clearly just placeholders or desired outcomes, with no plan on how to accomplish those outcomes, There are sections that could really use changes or clarifications. Much remains ahead for those who care for Mauna Kea and work to see that care turned into action. It is that process that the Mauna Kea Management Board and the Kahu Ku Mauna council continue in meetings like this.
It was at the end of another round of questions that one of the board members, silent to that point, directly responded to the protesters present. Describing himself as an apprentice kapuna, Herring Kalua took those present to task about their relationship to the mountain.
Here is a man born and raised on the Big Island, who is a state highway construction supervisor, a professional, who has devoted his life to his community and volunteered with many service organizations. He dropped that western professional demeanor and addressed the protesters on completely Hawaiian terms. In traditional style he described his relationship with the community, his sense of place, told everyone who he is. He then asked everyone what they were trying to accomplish, what did they bring to the mountain, what they did for their community. It was a challenge to do the hard things that it really took to make things better.
I listened and learned as Uncle Kalua spoke, I have never really met him, in those few minutes he had my respect. To one who has not spent time in the islands his manner of speaking may have seemed odd. First to introduce oneself, to describe one’s accomplishments and relationships at length in place of a brief name and title. To give time and space for the message, to carefully press the message home. It is a slow form of argument, but one I have seen is quite effective. As he spoke his language was a melange of English and Hawaiian words. Many of the Hawaiian terms he used do not translate well, the concepts foreign to the western way of thinking. As he spoke you could hear respect appear in the voices of the protesters, as he spoke they responded.
In the end the business of the day was accomplished. Keck Observatory received approval for our new weather instruments. Each of the other agenda items were completed. While the protesters may have hoped to express their views, I believe that something else happened. Many of them learned a little about the work that goes into caring for our mountain. That despite so many recent and very public accusations of mismanagement and neglect, the reality is that there is a great deal of effort occurring. I would hope that some of those present realize that the way forward is to work with us to protect the mountain. It is the little things that count; ants, pulling weeds, meetings and writing plans. We need to make room at the table for all who care for Mauna Kea, to write the future of the mountain.
Discover more from i L i n d
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I find it puzzling to attempt to compare the impacts of the “additional stress of the ongoing protest” to the types of impacts adding a very large building/telescope to the existing large number of telescopes will undoubtedly cause. It would be similar to me putting a hotel on the beach, touting my successful programs treating sewage, replenishing sand, picking up trash and doing landscaping, and then criticizing anyone who would dare to raise questions about my plans to add an additional hotel … I am surprised to find this article here because it seems Ian may be endorsing a subtle effort to discourage and quietly demean young people who are educating themselves and standing up for what they think is right.
. . . or he could be exposing us to another point of view and information we might not have had.
… Or both
… Or not both
The TMT enclosure is not much larger than the Subaru telescope and way off the summit. The fraction of Maunakea covered by telescopes is minuscule. The fraction covered by invasive species and used for off-roading is much much higher.
“It is the little things that count; ants, pulling weeds, meetings and writing plans. ”
NO- it is the big things that count. All these massive industrial scopes should not be built in a conservation zone. One doesn’t have to be a professional weed puller or bug counter to know this.
Good story telling can sometimes create cognitive dissonance and a misplaced need to blame the story teller.
Two weeks ago there a Mauna Kea post generated 50something comments and a fair amount of name calling. Now that subjects gets four posts. Has the heat of the moment passed, at least on Oahu?
I’d like to thank you for the reminder about Andrew Cooper’s blog. I had forgotten about it and am delighting in going back and reading what I’ve missed.